Set off provision against lottery income
This query is : Resolved
15 April 2012
Sir,
while reading section 115BB i noticed that:-
a)No expenditure is allowed against Lottery income except the portion of income payable to Government.
b)Set off of losses is not allowed against Lottery income.
My doubt is that whether set off of unabsorbed depreciation against Lottery income is allowed or not?
Thank You
Niranjan
while reading section 115BB i noticed that:-
a)No expenditure is allowed against Lottery income except the portion of income payable to Government.
b)Set off of losses is not allowed against Lottery income.
My doubt is that whether set off of unabsorbed depreciation against Lottery income is allowed or not?
Thank You
Niranjan
15 April 2012
In reading of bare section, it is seem as unabsorbed depreciation is allowed from any other income.
But we have to consider that The intention of statue is to tax lottery income at flat rate of taxation, hence in my view unabsorbed depreciation will not be allowed.
But we have to consider that The intention of statue is to tax lottery income at flat rate of taxation, hence in my view unabsorbed depreciation will not be allowed.
15 April 2012
Thank You sir for giving your view.
I have another issue:
A had accepted deposit from B in following order:
a) Cheque deposit Rs 10000
b) cash deposit Rs 11000
Receiving cash deposit of Rs 11000 is violation of section 269SS because aggregate deposit has crossed the allowable limit of Rs 19999 due to acceptance of cash deposit.
My doubt is whether penalty u/s 271D would be:
1. Rs 21000, or
2. Rs 11000, or
3. Rs 1001 (21000-19999)
Thank you once again
I have another issue:
A had accepted deposit from B in following order:
a) Cheque deposit Rs 10000
b) cash deposit Rs 11000
Receiving cash deposit of Rs 11000 is violation of section 269SS because aggregate deposit has crossed the allowable limit of Rs 19999 due to acceptance of cash deposit.
My doubt is whether penalty u/s 271D would be:
1. Rs 21000, or
2. Rs 11000, or
3. Rs 1001 (21000-19999)
Thank you once again
15 April 2012
2. 11000
The amount of 10000/- is not violating the provisions so on that no penalty will be levied on the amount received by cheque.
The amount of 10000/- is not violating the provisions so on that no penalty will be levied on the amount received by cheque.
Message likes :
1 times
15 April 2012
Thank You Paras Sir
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Fixe term employment
- Is any professional CA is here please reply
- GST ITC REVERSE
- Gift Received from nonblood relative
- EXPORT BILL UNDER LUT FREIGHT CHARGE INCLUED IN INVOICE IT LIABLE TO TAX
- Tax Audit u/s 44AB for Transport Business A proprietorship is engaged in transportation business and
- RCM ISSUE ON RENT AND TRANSPORTATION CHARGES
- Putting a heading on received mail
- Reprocessing of rectification order AY 2025-26
- Foreign lottery ticket bought online from India: legality, tax and consequences
- Consolidated financials
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
