section 269T
This query is : Resolved
R.Vijayakumar
(Querist)
29 June 2011
Dear Experts,
In the case of Partnership firm as on 31-03-2011 ,on eof the partner was retired and the retiring partner has received his share in cash exceeding Rs. 20000/-. on 20-04-2011.
I want to know that whether continuing partnership firm can paid cash to retiring partner - whether section 269T is attracted ?
Advance Thanks...
In the case of Partnership firm as on 31-03-2011 ,on eof the partner was retired and the retiring partner has received his share in cash exceeding Rs. 20000/-. on 20-04-2011.
I want to know that whether continuing partnership firm can paid cash to retiring partner - whether section 269T is attracted ?
Advance Thanks...
CA PARAS BAFNA
(Expert)
29 June 2011
The credit balance in the capital account of retiring partner is on account of his capital contribution made earlier and due to accumulated profits. He has not given any loan or advance to the firm.
On this ground, I can say that the firm can pay the balance to the partner as it is repayment of capital and not the repayment
of loan as prescribed U/s 269T.
On this ground, I can say that the firm can pay the balance to the partner as it is repayment of capital and not the repayment
of loan as prescribed U/s 269T.
Message likes :
1 times
CA PARAS BAFNA
(Expert)
29 June 2011
Dear Vijaykumar,
https://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/382109/
In the above case law, CIT (A) remained of the same view as I have replied above. But the tribunal has considered the matter as if the retiring partner has kept the amount deposited with the firm and as such Section 269T becomes applicable.
However, the above case is related with penalty U/s 271E and decided in favour of the assessee yet it is clear that the view expressed by me does not stand good.
https://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/382109/
In the above case law, CIT (A) remained of the same view as I have replied above. But the tribunal has considered the matter as if the retiring partner has kept the amount deposited with the firm and as such Section 269T becomes applicable.
However, the above case is related with penalty U/s 271E and decided in favour of the assessee yet it is clear that the view expressed by me does not stand good.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Query on effect of registration of property
- Due date for filing return for the partner in partnership subjected to Tax Audit
- Visiting card purchase
- GST on reimbursement of expenses
- Additional trade name
- Goodwill transfer of deceased father’s firm – ICAI applying a 27.04.2026 cut-off to the 3 year limit
- Wrong CMPo8 file
- Whether output tax is taken credit by purchaser
- Number of years as per AS amortisation of Goodwill
- Equity Share Sale and Purchase
- Classification of income of P Ltd company as business or profession
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Need to correct "Whether it is last installment " response in Form 26 QB
- " Income from House Property " in joint names of co-owners
- REGARDING TDS RETURN OF FORM 27Q
- Notice under e-Verification Scheme
- GST demand notice for ITC reversal against exempted supply.
- RCM ON SECURITY CHARGES FROM INDIVIDUALS
- How to get money back from delisted company
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
