section 269T
This query is : Resolved
29 June 2011
Dear Experts,
In the case of Partnership firm as on 31-03-2011 ,on eof the partner was retired and the retiring partner has received his share in cash exceeding Rs. 20000/-. on 20-04-2011.
I want to know that whether continuing partnership firm can paid cash to retiring partner - whether section 269T is attracted ?
Advance Thanks...
In the case of Partnership firm as on 31-03-2011 ,on eof the partner was retired and the retiring partner has received his share in cash exceeding Rs. 20000/-. on 20-04-2011.
I want to know that whether continuing partnership firm can paid cash to retiring partner - whether section 269T is attracted ?
Advance Thanks...
29 June 2011
The credit balance in the capital account of retiring partner is on account of his capital contribution made earlier and due to accumulated profits. He has not given any loan or advance to the firm.
On this ground, I can say that the firm can pay the balance to the partner as it is repayment of capital and not the repayment
of loan as prescribed U/s 269T.
On this ground, I can say that the firm can pay the balance to the partner as it is repayment of capital and not the repayment
of loan as prescribed U/s 269T.
Message likes :
1 times
29 June 2011
Dear Vijaykumar,
https://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/382109/
In the above case law, CIT (A) remained of the same view as I have replied above. But the tribunal has considered the matter as if the retiring partner has kept the amount deposited with the firm and as such Section 269T becomes applicable.
However, the above case is related with penalty U/s 271E and decided in favour of the assessee yet it is clear that the view expressed by me does not stand good.
https://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/382109/
In the above case law, CIT (A) remained of the same view as I have replied above. But the tribunal has considered the matter as if the retiring partner has kept the amount deposited with the firm and as such Section 269T becomes applicable.
However, the above case is related with penalty U/s 271E and decided in favour of the assessee yet it is clear that the view expressed by me does not stand good.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- House Property Reporting in ITR
- TDS Claim year
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- Supply through E-commerce Operators
- Rent lease agreement
- TDS Challan Code
- Relief u/s Section 89
- REGARDING SECTION 44AE
- Is it compulsory to File 10E if Income including Pension Arrears is below 12 Lakh for the F Y 25 26
- Suggestions required for income tax filing-software (FY 2025-26)
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
