limitation act...application...Urgent Sir!!!
This query is : Resolved
14 August 2010
Dear Experts,
Want to know as per Limitation Act...how many years should it take to write-off sundry debtor or sundry creditor balance?
Is it 3 years or 5 years?
With regards,
Rajesh.
Want to know as per Limitation Act...how many years should it take to write-off sundry debtor or sundry creditor balance?
Is it 3 years or 5 years?
With regards,
Rajesh.
14 August 2010
After three years as per limitation act you cannot claim amount from debtors and creditors cannot claim from you.
Message likes :
1 times
14 August 2010
For income tax purpose,to write off a debt, Limitation Act need not be considered by virtue of the amendment in section 36(i)(vii) with effect from 1/4/1989. Accordingly, assessee's are not required to prove that a debt has become bad meaning thereby that they need only to write off a debt as irrecoverable in their accounts so as to claim 36(1)(vii).
Citation : -CIT Vs. Autometers Ltd (2008) 167 Taxman 286 (Delhi)
Citation : -CIT Vs. Autometers Ltd (2008) 167 Taxman 286 (Delhi)
Message likes :
1 times
14 August 2010
visit this link fo details
https://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/limitationact/Schedule/Division1/PART%20I.html
https://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/limitationact/Schedule/Division1/PART%20I.html
Message likes :
1 times
14 August 2010
and also in this judgement by the Bobay high court
The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of bad debt which was written off by the assessee. But the learned CIT(A) deleted the said disallowance. Further, the Hon’ble ITAT confirmed the said deletion. On appeal by the Department in High Court, the Court held that the provisions of section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were to be read with the Board Circular No. 551 dt. 23-1-1990 and if the assessee had written off the debt as a bad debt, that would satisfy the purpose of the section. The High Court dismissed the appeal.
CIT vs. Star Chemicals (Bombay) P. Ltd. (2009) 313 ITR 126 (Bom.)
The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of bad debt which was written off by the assessee. But the learned CIT(A) deleted the said disallowance. Further, the Hon’ble ITAT confirmed the said deletion. On appeal by the Department in High Court, the Court held that the provisions of section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were to be read with the Board Circular No. 551 dt. 23-1-1990 and if the assessee had written off the debt as a bad debt, that would satisfy the purpose of the section. The High Court dismissed the appeal.
CIT vs. Star Chemicals (Bombay) P. Ltd. (2009) 313 ITR 126 (Bom.)
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITR 2 Short Term gain & Long term gain
- Reporting Income under Section 44ADA
- Itr 1 processing
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- ITR returnFY25-26
- Short Term Capital gain on shares bought and sold after 2018 onwards
- ITR validation error - Balance sheet is not filled
- ITR 1: Details for showing Exempt Income
- Bank Accounts in Balance Sheet for ITR 3
- INCOME TAX ON REDEVELOPEMENT OF FLAT
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- Difference in tax comparison report
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
