It return
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
25 September 2015
will inaccurate particulars/information in Status section of ITR furnished by oversight attract penalty (while there is no impact on income or tax)
26 September 2015
No.
Citation:- CIT Vs. Hapur Pikhuwa Development Authority . 218 Taxman 116.
Citation:- CIT Vs. Hapur Pikhuwa Development Authority . 218 Taxman 116.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Regarding Appointment of auditor in case of casual vacancy
- GST- DRC 03 RCM Liability
- Conversion of Proprietorship Firm to Partnership Firm
- Validity of form 15 G and 15 H on Interest on fixed deposit
- Query on managerial remuneration u/s 197 of CA 2013
- Supply to unit situated in SEZ
- Threshold limit of under GST for insurance agent
- GSTR 1- Amend Credit Note
- Updated return filing
- International transfer pricing- -> father entity vs son entity ->WHERE NO mutual say in management
- EXCESS CREDIT REALTED GST REVERSAL
- Export invoice not reported
- CA Articleship Extension Matter
- GST OFFICER WRONG NOTICE
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Composition Dealer GST Annual Return Filing process
- Revision under Section 264 in The Income Tax Act, 1961
- TDS under section 195.
- Filing GST Returns after death of proprietor
- Registered Required in GST Act
Trending Online Classes
-
LIVE Course on GSTR-9 & GSTR-9C (Technical | Practical | Concept - Based)
Sachin Jain03 November 2025
CAclubindia
