Income escaping assessment u/s 147
This query is : Resolved
02 November 2014
One of our client serve with notice u/s 148.The reason for such notice is improper deduction under house property. This notice is valid as there was mistake in claiming house property deduction due to which there is some income which has escaped. Now if AO go for 147 proceeding then he will scrutinize other heads of income also like capital gain, other sources etc. But my client does not have proper record of capital gain. So will AO have right to add those incomes also on the basis of lack of record ????
02 November 2014
AO cannot use a 148 proceeding to open up other aspects of the return. only that portion which is covered under the notice shall looked into.
04 November 2014
But Nikhil,
It is clearly written in Explanation 3 to section 147, which read as follows
"For the purpose of assessment or reassessment under this section, the AO may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped assessment, and such issue comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, notwithstanding that the reason for such issue have not been included in the reasons recorded under subsection(2) of section 148.
It is clearly written in Explanation 3 to section 147, which read as follows
"For the purpose of assessment or reassessment under this section, the AO may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped assessment, and such issue comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, notwithstanding that the reason for such issue have not been included in the reasons recorded under subsection(2) of section 148.
04 November 2014
Dear Vap,
my partial mistake...
in your case, the explanation will hold good given that the initial ground of reassessment holds good (error in house property income).
Had that ground been rejected, then the AO wont have been able to look into other incomes...refer Bombay High court judgment in Jet Airways case ( ITA No.1714 of 2009 with ITA No.1426 of 2008)
my partial mistake...
in your case, the explanation will hold good given that the initial ground of reassessment holds good (error in house property income).
Had that ground been rejected, then the AO wont have been able to look into other incomes...refer Bombay High court judgment in Jet Airways case ( ITA No.1714 of 2009 with ITA No.1426 of 2008)
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- House Property Reporting in ITR
- TDS Claim year
- Relief u/s Section 89
- Rent lease agreement
- TDS Challan Code
- Merchant Export Accounting
- Supply through E-commerce Operators
- STCG on ETF gold & silver
- If there is Long term capital gain exists how much total income to be considered
- Lease agreement and tax on sale
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
