FILING OF ITR A.Y. 2014-15 OF A FIRM

Save Share

This query is : Resolved

Quick Summary

A firm filed its Income Tax Return (ITR) for AY 2014-15 physically, claiming a refund, despite electronic filing being mandatory. The refund remains unprocessed, and the IT Department states this is due to the manual submission. The firm is seeking alternatives to resolve this issue and secure the refund, questioning whether procedural law overrides substantive law in this case.

Ridhdhi Gada

Ridhdhi Gada (Querist)

04 February 2020 FIRM HAS FILED ITR PHYSICALLY (PAPER FORM) U/S 139(4) FOR A.Y. 2014-15 CLAIMING REFUND RS. 23000/-
even if it was mandatory to file electronically.

REFUND IS YET NOT PROCESSED TILL NOW
HAVE FILED NUMEROUS LETTERS TO IT DEPARTMENT
ALSO FILED GRIEVANCE ON E PORTAL

THEY ARE REPLYING THAT REFUND COULD NOT BE PROCESSED SINCE ITR IS FILED MANUALLY

IS THERE ANY OTHER ALTERNATIVE ? HOW TO PROCEED WITH THIS AND HOW TO GET THE REFUND??

CS,CA F,Numrologi TusharSampat

CS,CA F,Numrologi TusharSampat (Expert)

05 February 2020 But when it is required to be filled electronically only then why you filing it manually.

Meet the concerned jurisdictional AO & get it solved.

Ridhdhi Gada

Ridhdhi Gada (Querist)

05 February 2020 FOR SOME REASON IT WAS FILED PHYSICALLY . IT COULD NOT BE FILED ELECTRONICALLY. DOES THAT MEAN FIRM IS NOT ENTITLED FOR REFUND ?? DOES PROCEDURAL LAW OVERRIDE SUBSTANTIVE LAW??

CS,CA F,Numrologi TusharSampat

CS,CA F,Numrologi TusharSampat (Expert)

05 February 2020 If its specifically provided to file electronically then specific overrides the general. Administrative shall prevail as it specifically mentions only electronic filling.

in my humble view do not argue with the income tax department for gaining the above amount and avoid any fights or litigation with them.

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now