Exemption u/s 54 very urgent
This query is : Resolved
21 March 2014
Dear Sir,
Please clear me I have sold two flat in 2010-2011 and invest this capital gain amount in one residential flat as on date 14/02/2011 and get exemption u/s 54 I have not get possession till date not there is some time rest for possession.Now case have been selected in scrutniy on the base of this capital gain. now assessing officer is not allowed the exemption of section 54 and issue a show case notice why should you given exemption u/s 54 while you have not get possession till date if i give some ruleing regarding this than assessing officer is bound to final the case as per ruling or not and he use his discreation and penalise to me with penalty and also tell me what is my fault when builder is not given possession on time i am also getting loss about this investment.
Thanks in advance
Please clear me I have sold two flat in 2010-2011 and invest this capital gain amount in one residential flat as on date 14/02/2011 and get exemption u/s 54 I have not get possession till date not there is some time rest for possession.Now case have been selected in scrutniy on the base of this capital gain. now assessing officer is not allowed the exemption of section 54 and issue a show case notice why should you given exemption u/s 54 while you have not get possession till date if i give some ruleing regarding this than assessing officer is bound to final the case as per ruling or not and he use his discreation and penalise to me with penalty and also tell me what is my fault when builder is not given possession on time i am also getting loss about this investment.
Thanks in advance
21 March 2014
Possession date is important to count the time limit for exemption under section 54.
Citation :- CIT Vs Mrs. Shahzada Begum [1988] 173 ITR 397(AP).
Since you have not obtained possession, in all probability, the assessing officer will not allow your claim meaning thereby you will be assessed to tax. If happens so, seek relief in appeal before higher authorities citing Chennai High court decision in CIT Vs. Sardamal Kothari [2006] 302 ITR 286.
Citation :- CIT Vs Mrs. Shahzada Begum [1988] 173 ITR 397(AP).
Since you have not obtained possession, in all probability, the assessing officer will not allow your claim meaning thereby you will be assessed to tax. If happens so, seek relief in appeal before higher authorities citing Chennai High court decision in CIT Vs. Sardamal Kothari [2006] 302 ITR 286.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- LC charges in relation to Asset purchased should be Capitalised ?
- Regarding appeal to GSTAT
- Regarding TDS Applicability For Director Remuneration
- Copyright software
- Value of property in capital gain
- Multiple trade mark
- Transporter Declaration form
- SALE OF MOTOR CAR BY REGISTERED INDIVIDUAL
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
- Address Change to another state of a Registered Trust with 12AB approval
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
