Difference in UOM under GST Portal and EwayBill

This query is : Resolved

biju parambil (Querist)
Follow

10 July 2024 Today while filing the GSTR1 under HSN it was noticed that we should use UOM as "NOS-NUMBERS" instead of "NOS" which was accepted till last filing... However, under EwayBill UOM still accept "NOS".

Did any one encountered this issue?

There should be some consistent between these two different dataset... otherwise making changes in all the software is a teadious task... Hope InfoSys undertsands this....

Aashok Kumar Sharma

Aashok Kumar Sharma

(Expert)
Follow

12 July 2024 It seems like you've encountered an issue related to the Unit of Measurement (UOM) while filing GSTR-1 under the HSN (Harmonized System of Nomenclature) code. The specific issue is with the format of UOM being accepted as "NOS-NUMBERS" instead of just "NOS," which was acceptable previously. However, you've noted that the e-way bill system still accepts "NOS" as the UOM.

This kind of discrepancy between different datasets within the GST ecosystem can indeed pose challenges, especially for businesses and software developers who need to ensure compliance and accuracy in reporting.

### Understanding the Issue:

1. **UOM in GST Returns (GSTR-1):**
- The GSTN (Goods and Services Tax Network) portal for filing GSTR-1 requires accurate UOM to be specified under each HSN code for reporting purposes.
- If there has been a recent change where "NOS-NUMBERS" is now required instead of "NOS," it indicates a revision in how UOMs are recognized or interpreted by the GSTN system.

2. **UOM in E-Way Bills:**
- On the other hand, the e-way bill system continues to accept "NOS" as the UOM.
- This discrepancy might be due to different implementation timelines or requirements across different modules of the GST system managed by GSTN and NIC (National Informatics Centre).

### Impact and Resolution:

1. **Compliance and Reporting:**
- To comply with GSTR-1 filing requirements, businesses may need to update their software or manual processes to reflect the new UOM format ("NOS-NUMBERS").
- This ensures that the data submitted via GSTR-1 aligns with the current specifications mandated by GSTN.

2. **Software Update Considerations:**
- For businesses using ERP systems or GST filing software, it's crucial to communicate with software providers or developers to implement necessary updates.
- This update process can indeed be tedious and requires coordination to ensure all systems are aligned with the latest GST requirements.

3. **Feedback to GSTN:**
- Providing feedback to GSTN through appropriate channels can help highlight usability issues and discrepancies like these.
- It's essential for GSTN and stakeholders (including software providers) to work towards harmonizing such requirements to reduce compliance burdens.

### Conclusion:

While encountering discrepancies like these between GSTR-1 and e-way bill systems is challenging, it underscores the importance of staying updated with GSTN notifications and ensuring compliance through software updates and procedural adjustments. Communicating feedback and suggestions to GSTN can also contribute to improvements in system usability and consistency across different GST modules.

If you need further assistance or clarification on specific actions to take, consulting with a GST practitioner or contacting GSTN support directly would be advisable to navigate these changes effectively.

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now