Clarifiation on open offer
This query is : Resolved
30 October 2012
Dear Sir,
There is one Company in which the past promoters of the Company had triggered the OPEN Offer but they did not made the open offer to the shareholders and now they are no more the promoters of the Company and now the Company is going to be taken over by new Individual and he is making an open offer.
My query in this regards is that whether the New Individual is liable for the default made by old promoters or old promoters are liable or the Company is liable for the same and if the new promoter is liable then what are the things he needs to do to rectify the same.
Kindly cite any relevant case laws clarifying the same, If any.
There is one Company in which the past promoters of the Company had triggered the OPEN Offer but they did not made the open offer to the shareholders and now they are no more the promoters of the Company and now the Company is going to be taken over by new Individual and he is making an open offer.
My query in this regards is that whether the New Individual is liable for the default made by old promoters or old promoters are liable or the Company is liable for the same and if the new promoter is liable then what are the things he needs to do to rectify the same.
Kindly cite any relevant case laws clarifying the same, If any.
31 October 2012
Hi
The Companies Act, 1956, contains no provisions regarding duties of the promoters. Section 62,63 and 542 only impose liabilities of promoters for untrue statement in the prospectus and fraudulent trading.
In Gluckstein v. Barnes (1900) A.C. 240 it was held that where a promoter makes some profits in connection with a transaction to which company is party and does not make full disclosure of his profits, the company has the right to affirm the contracts and promoter should handover his profit to the company.
The the new promoter will not be liable for any act of old promoters.
The Companies Act, 1956, contains no provisions regarding duties of the promoters. Section 62,63 and 542 only impose liabilities of promoters for untrue statement in the prospectus and fraudulent trading.
In Gluckstein v. Barnes (1900) A.C. 240 it was held that where a promoter makes some profits in connection with a transaction to which company is party and does not make full disclosure of his profits, the company has the right to affirm the contracts and promoter should handover his profit to the company.
The the new promoter will not be liable for any act of old promoters.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- Value of property in capital gain
- LC charges in relation to Asset purchased should be Capitalised ?
- Multiple trade mark
- Regarding appeal to GSTAT
- Regarding TDS Applicability For Director Remuneration
- Copyright software
- Transporter Declaration form
- SALE OF MOTOR CAR BY REGISTERED INDIVIDUAL
- Taxation on Swing Trading Income (No Other Income)
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
