Vat liabilities
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
16 June 2012
Please advice below Case
There are one propitiatory firm M/s A register for VAT in Mumbai and sale to another firm M/s B that in also register in Mumbai
But material purchase from M/s C Banglore, Karnatka and delivery also in Banglore behalf of second firm M/s B those of register in Mumbai
Please advice below.
Vat Paid in Karnatka can we take credit benefit in Maharashra or any other benefit can get for vat paid paid in karnatka.
There are one propitiatory firm M/s A register for VAT in Mumbai and sale to another firm M/s B that in also register in Mumbai
But material purchase from M/s C Banglore, Karnatka and delivery also in Banglore behalf of second firm M/s B those of register in Mumbai
Please advice below.
Vat Paid in Karnatka can we take credit benefit in Maharashra or any other benefit can get for vat paid paid in karnatka.
16 June 2012
To my knowledge, VAT paid to a dealer outside the state where purchaser is registered will not be allowed as credit against VAT received from within state of registered dealer.
But if there is a case when registered dealer paid VAT within state of registered dealer and sales to outside state than this VAT paid within state can be set off against collection from outside state.
In your case my first answer is applicable as you are purchasing from Karnataka and selling within the state of Maharashtra where dealer is registered in Maharashtra. VAT credit is not allowed.
But if there is a case when registered dealer paid VAT within state of registered dealer and sales to outside state than this VAT paid within state can be set off against collection from outside state.
In your case my first answer is applicable as you are purchasing from Karnataka and selling within the state of Maharashtra where dealer is registered in Maharashtra. VAT credit is not allowed.
16 June 2012
Mr Author,
There was another solution for this problem i.e. E1 sale.You could have thought of it earlier and reduced the tax burden to just 2% only.In future think of this idea....MJK
There was another solution for this problem i.e. E1 sale.You could have thought of it earlier and reduced the tax burden to just 2% only.In future think of this idea....MJK
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITR 2 Short Term gain & Long term gain
- Itr 1 processing
- Reporting Income under Section 44ADA
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- ITR returnFY25-26
- ITR 1: Details for showing Exempt Income
- INCOME TAX ON REDEVELOPEMENT OF FLAT
- Short Term Capital gain on shares bought and sold after 2018 onwards
- Form 10E u/s 89(1). Need clarification because experts opinions differ !!!!
- Article ship defecit
- Bank Accounts in Balance Sheet for ITR 3
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- Difference in tax comparison report
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
