Valuation
This query is : Resolved
18 July 2011
Whether subsidy on fertilizers received by a co. from government will be included in assessable value?
20 July 2011
As the same is not received from the buyer may notbe applicable. Also maybe a post removal receipt.
25 July 2011
As per Rule 6 of Excise Valuation Rules, 2000
ü Where the price is not the sole consideration for sale,
ü the value of such goods shall be deemed to be
ü the aggregate of such transaction value and the amount of money value of any additional consideration flowing directly or indirectly from the buyer to the assessee.
The board has clarified under Rule 6 that the additional consideration should flow directly or indirectly from the buyer to the seller.
In the given case the subsidy of 20% from the government could not be said to be additional consideration as it was not received from the buyer either directly or indirectly. Therefore, that would not be includible in the price of the goods for the purposes of excise. However, the 10% subsidy received by the assessee from the buyer was additional consideration. The fact that it was received under a policy of the government did not detract from the above position.
A similar judgment was given by the Supreme Court in the case of
Mazagaon Dock Ltd.
where the subsidy received from the buyer directly/indirectly was included in the assessable value.
ü Where the price is not the sole consideration for sale,
ü the value of such goods shall be deemed to be
ü the aggregate of such transaction value and the amount of money value of any additional consideration flowing directly or indirectly from the buyer to the assessee.
The board has clarified under Rule 6 that the additional consideration should flow directly or indirectly from the buyer to the seller.
In the given case the subsidy of 20% from the government could not be said to be additional consideration as it was not received from the buyer either directly or indirectly. Therefore, that would not be includible in the price of the goods for the purposes of excise. However, the 10% subsidy received by the assessee from the buyer was additional consideration. The fact that it was received under a policy of the government did not detract from the above position.
A similar judgment was given by the Supreme Court in the case of
Mazagaon Dock Ltd.
where the subsidy received from the buyer directly/indirectly was included in the assessable value.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- House Property Reporting in ITR
- Internship/Academic shown in Salary Pay Slip of a Doctor
- TDS Claim year
- Refund of 20%pre-deposit paid for stay application
- Rent lease agreement
- TDS Challan Code
- Relief u/s Section 89
- Nomination of Bank for refund in itr 2
- GST Rate applicable for 0% Food Items sold by an Industrial Caterer
- STCG on ETF gold & silver
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
