09 July 2014
I understand your point but as per my advice you should mention sub points through the use of a.), b.), c.), d.) only. This will help checker to connect specifically with the main point.
If you use bullet system you will have to face problem in case of any statutory provision. So it is advisable to avoid bullet system.
There’s **no formal rule that outright bans using bullets** like small circled ones in your CA exam answers. But, examiners generally prefer **clear, easy-to-follow numbering** — especially when you’re referring to **statutory provisions, sections, or clauses**.
### Why avoid fancy bullets for sub-points, especially in law/IT papers?
* **Precision:** When you number sub-points as a), b), c), it’s easier for the examiner to link your answers to specific parts of the question or statutory clauses. * **Clarity:** If you just use bullets (● or ○), it might be harder for the examiner to pinpoint or comment on specific parts when giving feedback or marks. * **Consistency:** Numbering sub-points keeps your answer organized, showing structure and clarity — which can help in scoring.
### So in short:
* You **can** use bullets, but it’s safer to stick with a), b), c) for sub-points — especially when citing laws or sections. * For general points or theory, bullets might be okay if used neatly. * When in doubt, follow the traditional numbering to avoid any chance of losing marks due to unclear presentation.