26 June 2026
The taxable value of the assets is ₹10,00,000, with GST amounting to ₹1,80,000, making the total invoice value raised by the supplier ₹11,80,000.
During payment processing, it has been observed that the department has proposed to deduct Liquidated Damages (LD) of ₹50,000 on account of delay in the supply and installation of the assets.
As per my understanding, TDS under the Income Tax Act @2% and TDS on GST @2% should be deducted on the original taxable value of ₹10,00,000.
However, my reporting officer is of the view that TDS and TDS on GST should be deducted on the taxable value after adjusting the LD amount, i.e., ₹9,50,000.
In my opinion, Liquidated Damages are in the nature of compensation for delay and should not result in a reduction of the taxable value of the asset for the purpose of TDS deduction. Please suggest.
26 June 2026
Your view is generally the stronger one, provided the contract/invoice has not been revised by issuing a GST credit note reducing the taxable value. TDS base should normally be the amount payable for the supply after excluding GST, but a liquidated damages adjustment is not the same thing as reducing the taxable value of the original supply. In practice, if the department is deducting ₹50,000 as LD from the vendor’s bill, that deduction is a separate contractual adjustment/compensation and should not be treated as a reduction in the invoice value for computing TDS on the original supply. If the vendor supplied assets worth ₹10,00,000 and the department later recovers ₹50,000 as compensation for delay, that recovery is a post-supply adjustment, not a downward revision of the price of goods/services supplied. Unless the invoice itself is revised through a valid credit note or contractual price reduction tied to the supply value, the original taxable value remains ₹10,00,000.