Tax deducted at source

This query is : Resolved 

16 August 2013 Sir,
a company pays to it distributors & parties a certain regular amount monthly as display expenses against the shell or cupboard provided by the distributors for the display of the products of the company.whether tds should be deducted u/s 194c as advertisement or 194I as rent?.
Please provide ur sugestion as soon as possible and also please provide the clause or section for the reference.

16 August 2013 Yes it will certainly comes under preview of Section 194C as advertisement contract not under section 194I.


16 August 2013 Mukesh sir whether the sum will be assumed as the payment for the rent of space provided by the distributor?

16 August 2013 It is Covered under 194I and not under 194C in my opinion which i can suport as below

1)The contract for putting up a hoarding is in the nature of advertising contract and provisions of section 194C would be applicable.

2)It may, however, be clarified that if a person has taken a particular space on rent and thereafter sublets the same fully or in part for putting up a hoarding, he would be liable to TDS under **section 194-I and not under section 194C of the Act.

Reference: Circlar 715 dated 08.08.1995

Thanks & regards
Ganesh babu k

17 August 2013 Dear Ganesh G as per Section 194-I

"rent" means any payment, by whatever name called, under any lease, sub-lease, tenancy or any other agreement or arrangement for the use of (either separately or together) any,—
(a) land; or
(b) building (including factory building); or
(c) land appurtenant to a building (including factory building); or
(d) machinery; or
(e) plant; or
(f) equipment; or
(g) furniture; or
(h) fittings,
whether or not any or all of the above are owned by the payee/contractor;]

In present case Cupboards/shell is not Land & building or Plant or Furniture & fitting as per meaning of Section 194-I

Therefore it certainly comes under preview of Section 194-C


17 August 2013 In the given situation can be treated as Hoarding site given by the assessee.

As per decision in case: ITO vs Roshan Publicity (p) ltd (2005) 4 SOT 105 (Mumbai)

Sec.194C apply when an advertising agent makes payment to owners of hoarding site

Refer full case law for complete details


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 July 2026
Article Assistants

R Shyam and Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
05 July 2026
Financial Controller

NovumLake Partners

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Senior Accountant

Felicity Adobe LLP

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 July 2026
Article Assistant

N S Gokhale & Co

Thane

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 July 2026
Semi qualified CA

Garg Bros & Associate CA

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 July 2026
Senior Executive/ Manager

H S SHARMA AND CO

Pune

CA Final

View Details
Company
22 July 2026
Senior Chartered Accountant

SKSS

Patna

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 11 July 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details