Service tax on " rental of immovable property services'
This query is : Resolved
08 April 2009
Dear friends,
a lessor got regn under ST on 24.03.09 for " rental of immovable property services'and claiming ST from 01.04.2008 ( i.e from FY begining onwards ).
query is;
1.Is it correct charging ST with retrospective effect?
2.Will ST applicalbe on the full value of rent paid?
3.Is ST applicable on arrears of rent also?
4.The property belongs to HUF and rent paid to individual co parceners by separate cheques after TDS.But only one co parcener charging ST out of his share of rent.Is it correct or we have to pay voluntarily to all the owners?
a lessor got regn under ST on 24.03.09 for " rental of immovable property services'and claiming ST from 01.04.2008 ( i.e from FY begining onwards ).
query is;
1.Is it correct charging ST with retrospective effect?
2.Will ST applicalbe on the full value of rent paid?
3.Is ST applicable on arrears of rent also?
4.The property belongs to HUF and rent paid to individual co parceners by separate cheques after TDS.But only one co parcener charging ST out of his share of rent.Is it correct or we have to pay voluntarily to all the owners?
18 April 2009
query is replied as under ;
1.If service has been provided and service tax was not charged, then it is correct charge ST with retrospective effect
2.Yes ST applicalbe on the full value of rent paid
3.Yes ST applicable on arrears of rent also as services were provided during the levy of tax
4.This must be due to the reasons that they all must be falling under the threshold exemption of 10 lacs. If the service provider is not charging the onus is on them to discharge the liability.
By a written arrangement you should state that any liability arising in future due to ignorance of not charging the taxes, the same shall not be paid at a later date.
1.If service has been provided and service tax was not charged, then it is correct charge ST with retrospective effect
2.Yes ST applicalbe on the full value of rent paid
3.Yes ST applicable on arrears of rent also as services were provided during the levy of tax
4.This must be due to the reasons that they all must be falling under the threshold exemption of 10 lacs. If the service provider is not charging the onus is on them to discharge the liability.
By a written arrangement you should state that any liability arising in future due to ignorance of not charging the taxes, the same shall not be paid at a later date.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- Exiting partner in partnership firm in gst portal
- Type of Capital Gain
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- LIABILITY ADJUSTMENT
- ITR-3 File/Error Found
- Due Date Clarity
- Accounting with Claude
- TDS _Long term Capital Gain ref.sec 214 Table 2
- VALUATION OF PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY SHARES
- Gst on travel by air for business purposes
- Loss of interest in PF transfer from EPFO to Trust
- Seeking Advice: High Tax Shortfall on Job Switch + Let-Out House Property Loss in FY 2025-26
- TDS offline utility
- TDS on rent received on hardship compensation being rent on redevelopment of building
- Housing Society-ITR5
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
