Section 68/69 vs 41(1)

This query is : Resolved

Satish Mehra (Querist)
Follow

13 August 2024 If the sundry creditors (old carried forward from previous years in AUDIT REPORT) are added back to income during the survey and offered to income under PGBP and IFOS for AY 2018-19 (the year of the survey). What will be the section of inclusion will it be under 41(1) or 68/69 of income tax.

Aashok Kumar Sharma

Aashok Kumar Sharma (Expert)
Follow

12 August 2025 Great question! Here's a clear explanation of **Sections 41(1) vs 68/69** of the Income Tax Act in the context of sundry creditors added back during a survey:

---

### Background:

* **Sundry creditors** (old liabilities carried forward from previous years) found during a survey.
* These amounts were **added back to income** and offered to tax under **Profits & Gains from Business or Profession (PGBP)** and **Income from Other Sources (IFOS)** for AY 2018-19 (year of survey).

---

### What do Sections 41(1), 68, and 69 say?

| Section | Brief Explanation | Applicability to your case |
| ----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Section 41(1)** | Provides for addition to income when **liabilities previously allowed as deduction are found to be bogus, or not payable**. | When a liability (like sundry creditor) which was **claimed as deduction in earlier years** is now found to be fake or non-existent, its amount is added back to income in the year of detection. |
| **Section 68** | Deals with unexplained cash credits in books of account. | When **unexplained cash credits** are found (i.e., credits without adequate explanation), they are treated as income. |
| **Section 69** | Deals with unexplained investments, money, or bullion found during survey or search. | When **unexplained investments or money** are found, their value is treated as income. |

---

### Applying to your situation:

* Sundry creditors are **liabilities**, not cash credits or investments.
* These creditors were **already recorded as liabilities**, likely deducted earlier.
* Now, during the survey, they are found to be **bogus or not payable**.

Hence,

* The **correct section for adding back such bogus liabilities** (like sundry creditors carried forward and found bogus) is **Section 41(1)**.
* **Section 68/69** are generally for unexplained cash credits (Section 68) or unexplained money/investments found during survey/search (Section 69), which do not apply to sundry creditors.

---

### Summary:

| Nature of Income | Relevant Section |
| ------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- |
| Bogus liabilities (like sundry creditors found bogus) | **Section 41(1)** |
| Unexplained cash credits | Section 68 |
| Unexplained investments or money found in survey/search | Section 69 |

---

### Important:

* If the sundry creditors were **never deducted in earlier years**, addition under Section 41(1) may not be applicable; it might then be assessed as income under other applicable heads or sections.
* Always check if the taxpayer claimed deduction earlier and whether the addition is for reversal of that deduction.

---

If you want, I can help draft a detailed note or help with case law references related to this. Interested?

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok