Section 35d
Querist : Anonymous
.
Querist : Anonymous
A CA Firm (partnership firm) can also not liable to claim benefit of sec 35D without tax audit. Is it correct sir?
.
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
- Is any professional CA is here please reply
- Reopen of assessment proceeding
- Rental income gst and it purpose
- Experts need help
- EPF FULL & FINAL RULES IN 2026
- Reprocessing of rectification order AY 2025-26
- FTS Taxable under 115A
- Putting a heading on received mail
- COMMERCIAL INVOICE FOR MATERIAL AND FREIGHT
- Foreign lottery ticket bought online from India: legality, tax and consequences
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
