Section 35d
Querist : Anonymous
.
Querist : Anonymous
A CA Firm (partnership firm) can also not liable to claim benefit of sec 35D without tax audit. Is it correct sir?
.
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
- Gst on travel by air for business purposes
- CLOSING STOCK QUERY
- F&O reporting in ITR
- Taxation on Old jewellery sold
- TDS refund Indemnity Bond
- Itr processing refund
- Technical Glitch in ITR-4 Online Form (AY 2026-27): Sec 44AE Partner Remuneration not mapping to E8
- TDS on rent received on hardship compensation being rent on redevelopment of building
- PF wage ceiling
- Missed TDS
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
- Query regarding reporting of exempt foreign remuneration in ITR (AY 2026-27)
- FEMA/RBI treatment — Amazon.ca arbitrage (US buy, Canada sell, goods never enter India)
- Goods return by customer
- INWARD REMITTANCE FOREIGN
- CPC and SAC
- Account freezed for Ineligible ITC Scrutiny for GST Annual Return
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
