Section 271(1)(c)
This query is : Resolved
12 February 2015
case laws related to the following query
whether penality is imposed by cit if return is revised before passing order u/s 143(3)
13 February 2015
CIT Vs. J.K.A. Subramania Chettiar (110) ITR 602 (Mad).
Held that when there is concealment in original return, revised return can not be treated to be u/s. 139(5) ,consequently penalty can be imposed u/s 271(1)(c).
Held that when there is concealment in original return, revised return can not be treated to be u/s. 139(5) ,consequently penalty can be imposed u/s 271(1)(c).
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax Audit u/s 44AB for Transport Business A proprietorship is engaged in transportation business and
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
