Section 271(1)(c)
This query is : Resolved
12 February 2015
case laws related to the following query
whether penality is imposed by cit if return is revised before passing order u/s 143(3)
13 February 2015
CIT Vs. J.K.A. Subramania Chettiar (110) ITR 602 (Mad).
Held that when there is concealment in original return, revised return can not be treated to be u/s. 139(5) ,consequently penalty can be imposed u/s 271(1)(c).
Held that when there is concealment in original return, revised return can not be treated to be u/s. 139(5) ,consequently penalty can be imposed u/s 271(1)(c).
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Section 54F - Exemption on LTCG in 2026 for HP purchased in 2023
- STCG....................................................
- TAN for Partnership
- AMOUNT RECEIVED UNDER COMPULOSRY ACQUISITION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND
- Sales return eway bill
- Treatment of Pension ?annuity returns on PMVY
- GST ON DAMAGED GOODS
- Long Term Service award taxability in hands of company
- Loan by Partnership Firm
- REGARDING GST LIABILITY/....
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Standard Deduction claim for EPFO Pension and ICICI Prudential Life Annuity
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- Nomination of Bank for refund in itr 2
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
