Query regarding section 40a(3) rule 6dd
This query is : Resolved
15 September 2015
I have come across a situation which doing tax audit of a client where the opening outstanding amount of creditors is more than 1 lac and he has made payment in various installments of 15000/- on different dates in cash. Is this way is correct or same could be disallowed.Please clarify
16 September 2015
nopes this is correct he can do so na.. payment in different dates is allowed...
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- ITDS U/S.194T of Firm
- TDS AND ITR ISSUE
- EXPORT COMMERCIAL INVOICE HSN CODE
- FCRA 6 E- Intimation
- URGENT-Eligible leaves being shown as 24 days for 3 years Articleship instead of 156 days in 108
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
