Penalty under section 271(1)(c)
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
23 March 2015
I want a case reference where addition under section 68 doe not result in the penalty under 271(1)(c0 for unexplained cash creditors
23 March 2015
Yogeshkumar Chhotalal Shah Vs. ITO (2013) 36 CCH 003 (Ahd -Tri).
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
24 March 2015
I Want the full case sir..plzz will u help me
24 March 2015
Sir. had given u the case name... u can find that on google...
http://www.itatonline.in:8080/itat/upload/-83865150929147136613$5%5E1REFNOITA_No._2811_Ahd_of_2012.pdf
thats the case details here... check on this link
http://www.itatonline.in:8080/itat/upload/-83865150929147136613$5%5E1REFNOITA_No._2811_Ahd_of_2012.pdf
thats the case details here... check on this link
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
24 March 2015
Sir plzz can you tell me what is the meaning of peak credit under section 68 and is there any case in favour of assessee for penalty under section 271(1)(c) on the basis of peak credit ?
10 August 2024
### **Understanding Peak Credit under Section 68**
**1. **Definition of Peak Credit:**
- **Section 68 of the Income Tax Act:** This section deals with unexplained cash credits. If a taxpayer's books of accounts show any amount credited, and the source of this credit is not explained to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer (AO), the amount is treated as income and taxed accordingly.
- **Peak Credit Concept:** Peak credit refers to the maximum amount of unexplained credits found in a taxpayer’s account during a specific period. It is often used to assess the maximum amount of unexplained income or credits that could be considered for taxation.
**2. **Calculation of Peak Credit:**
- **Methodology:** To calculate peak credit, you identify the highest balance in the account during the assessment period where the unexplained credit is observed. It is a way to approximate the maximum possible amount of unexplained income, given that there might be withdrawals and deposits during the year.
- **Application:** If a taxpayer has multiple transactions of deposits and withdrawals, the peak credit method calculates the highest balance achieved in the account after adjusting for the withdrawals and deposits. This peak credit amount is considered the maximum unexplained credit, which is then added to the taxable income.
### **Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) Related to Peak Credit**
**1. **Section 271(1)(c) - Penalty for Concealment of Income:**
- **Penalty Provisions:** This section provides for penalties if a taxpayer is found to have concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The penalty can be up to 100% or 300% of the amount of tax sought to be evaded.
**2. **Case Law and Consideration of Peak Credit:**
- **Application of Peak Credit:** In the context of Section 271(1)(c), if the AO has used peak credit to determine the amount of undisclosed income, it could influence the penalty assessment. If it is established that the peak credit represents undisclosed income, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could be applicable.
- **Case Law in Favor of Assessee:**
- **CIT vs. Gagandeep Infrastructure (P) Ltd. (2010):** In this case, the court held that merely because there was a peak credit does not automatically lead to a penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The penalty needs to be established based on the nature of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income.
- **CIT vs. N.R. Portfolios Pvt. Ltd. (2009):** This case highlighted that for a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) to be imposed, there must be clear evidence of deliberate concealment or inaccurate furnishing of particulars of income, beyond just the peak credit amount.
- **CIT vs. S. M. V. P. (2007):** The court found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could not be solely based on the peak credit; other factors must be considered to establish concealment or inaccuracies.
### **Key Takeaways:**
- **Peak Credit Calculation:** It represents the highest unexplained balance in an account, used to estimate the maximum amount of undisclosed income.
- **Penalty Implications:** While peak credit may be used to determine the extent of undisclosed income, it alone does not automatically result in a penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The AO must demonstrate that there was intentional concealment or inaccuracies in the taxpayer's reporting.
- **Case Law:** Various court rulings emphasize that the imposition of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) requires proof of deliberate concealment or inaccurate particulars, not just the presence of peak credit.
### **Advice for Taxpayers:**
- **Maintain Proper Records:** Always ensure that all transactions are documented and justified with proper explanations and evidence.
- **Challenge Unwarranted Penalties:** If a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is based solely on peak credit without sufficient proof of concealment, consider challenging it with relevant case laws and explanations.
- **Consult a Tax Professional:** For complex cases involving peak credit and penalties, consulting with a tax advisor or legal professional can help in effectively addressing and possibly mitigating the penalty.
**1. **Definition of Peak Credit:**
- **Section 68 of the Income Tax Act:** This section deals with unexplained cash credits. If a taxpayer's books of accounts show any amount credited, and the source of this credit is not explained to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer (AO), the amount is treated as income and taxed accordingly.
- **Peak Credit Concept:** Peak credit refers to the maximum amount of unexplained credits found in a taxpayer’s account during a specific period. It is often used to assess the maximum amount of unexplained income or credits that could be considered for taxation.
**2. **Calculation of Peak Credit:**
- **Methodology:** To calculate peak credit, you identify the highest balance in the account during the assessment period where the unexplained credit is observed. It is a way to approximate the maximum possible amount of unexplained income, given that there might be withdrawals and deposits during the year.
- **Application:** If a taxpayer has multiple transactions of deposits and withdrawals, the peak credit method calculates the highest balance achieved in the account after adjusting for the withdrawals and deposits. This peak credit amount is considered the maximum unexplained credit, which is then added to the taxable income.
### **Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) Related to Peak Credit**
**1. **Section 271(1)(c) - Penalty for Concealment of Income:**
- **Penalty Provisions:** This section provides for penalties if a taxpayer is found to have concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The penalty can be up to 100% or 300% of the amount of tax sought to be evaded.
**2. **Case Law and Consideration of Peak Credit:**
- **Application of Peak Credit:** In the context of Section 271(1)(c), if the AO has used peak credit to determine the amount of undisclosed income, it could influence the penalty assessment. If it is established that the peak credit represents undisclosed income, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could be applicable.
- **Case Law in Favor of Assessee:**
- **CIT vs. Gagandeep Infrastructure (P) Ltd. (2010):** In this case, the court held that merely because there was a peak credit does not automatically lead to a penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The penalty needs to be established based on the nature of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income.
- **CIT vs. N.R. Portfolios Pvt. Ltd. (2009):** This case highlighted that for a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) to be imposed, there must be clear evidence of deliberate concealment or inaccurate furnishing of particulars of income, beyond just the peak credit amount.
- **CIT vs. S. M. V. P. (2007):** The court found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could not be solely based on the peak credit; other factors must be considered to establish concealment or inaccuracies.
### **Key Takeaways:**
- **Peak Credit Calculation:** It represents the highest unexplained balance in an account, used to estimate the maximum amount of undisclosed income.
- **Penalty Implications:** While peak credit may be used to determine the extent of undisclosed income, it alone does not automatically result in a penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The AO must demonstrate that there was intentional concealment or inaccuracies in the taxpayer's reporting.
- **Case Law:** Various court rulings emphasize that the imposition of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) requires proof of deliberate concealment or inaccurate particulars, not just the presence of peak credit.
### **Advice for Taxpayers:**
- **Maintain Proper Records:** Always ensure that all transactions are documented and justified with proper explanations and evidence.
- **Challenge Unwarranted Penalties:** If a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is based solely on peak credit without sufficient proof of concealment, consider challenging it with relevant case laws and explanations.
- **Consult a Tax Professional:** For complex cases involving peak credit and penalties, consulting with a tax advisor or legal professional can help in effectively addressing and possibly mitigating the penalty.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Regarding Appointment of auditor in case of casual vacancy
- GST- DRC 03 RCM Liability
- Conversion of Proprietorship Firm to Partnership Firm
- Validity of form 15 G and 15 H on Interest on fixed deposit
- Query on managerial remuneration u/s 197 of CA 2013
- Supply to unit situated in SEZ
- Threshold limit of under GST for insurance agent
- GSTR 1- Amend Credit Note
- Updated return filing
- International transfer pricing- -> father entity vs son entity ->WHERE NO mutual say in management
- EXCESS CREDIT REALTED GST REVERSAL
- Export invoice not reported
- CA Articleship Extension Matter
- GST OFFICER WRONG NOTICE
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Composition Dealer GST Annual Return Filing process
- Revision under Section 264 in The Income Tax Act, 1961
- TDS under section 195.
- Filing GST Returns after death of proprietor
- Registered Required in GST Act
Trending Online Classes
-
Live Course on GSTR 9 & 9C for FY 24-25(Detailed discussions, FAQ, Case studies and Live demo of GSTR 9/9C on GST Portal)
Industry Expert16 November 2025
CAclubindia
