Penalty u/s 221
This query is : Resolved
30 October 2010
Dear Experts,
A company has dedcuted TDS during the year 2007-08 and 2008-09. Instead of depositing the tax monthly, it deposited in long intervals e.g. TDS decuted from Apr'07 to Dec' 07 was despoited in Mar'08 and like that. Although the company has paid interest for late payment as asked by the department, the the department further wants to initiate penalty proceeding u/s 221.
Is there any way out to avoid the penalty? Please advise with supporting case law if any.
A company has dedcuted TDS during the year 2007-08 and 2008-09. Instead of depositing the tax monthly, it deposited in long intervals e.g. TDS decuted from Apr'07 to Dec' 07 was despoited in Mar'08 and like that. Although the company has paid interest for late payment as asked by the department, the the department further wants to initiate penalty proceeding u/s 221.
Is there any way out to avoid the penalty? Please advise with supporting case law if any.
30 October 2010
First , what was the reason to make the deposit of tax so late instead of depositing on due dates.
If the reasons are acceptable, then there may be some way, otherwise penalty procedding is correctly initaited by the Deptt.
If the reasons are acceptable, then there may be some way, otherwise penalty procedding is correctly initaited by the Deptt.
Message likes :
1 times
30 October 2010
Dear Kesari,
1)As per law, the AO is extremly correct in levying the penalty and furthur u cant challenge him legally,
2)Reference of case law are generally taken when there is requirement of clarification on any law matters, otherwise it may not be so useful.
Advice :
According to me, the only way with u is "CONVENCING", try to convince the AO that penalty may cause "undue hardship or similar" with strong justification. If the Ao doesnt agree make an application to its juridicational superior officer.
1)As per law, the AO is extremly correct in levying the penalty and furthur u cant challenge him legally,
2)Reference of case law are generally taken when there is requirement of clarification on any law matters, otherwise it may not be so useful.
Advice :
According to me, the only way with u is "CONVENCING", try to convince the AO that penalty may cause "undue hardship or similar" with strong justification. If the Ao doesnt agree make an application to its juridicational superior officer.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- Need Professional Opinion - AY 2012-13 Old Demand & AY 2026-27 Refund Adjustment
- URGENT-Eligible leaves being shown as 24 days for 3 years Articleship instead of 156 days in 108
- FCRA 6 E- Intimation
- Bank details not Visible on Traces Portal
- Taxability of Partnership firm for FY 2025-26
- The TDS balance for March 26 shows a mismatch between the books and the portal; what should be done
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
