14 September 2012
If you have a valid acknowledgement to prove so, then go ahead.. no case law is required. Be in custody of the acknowledgement... the the question of corporate office, or central office, or registerred office or by whatever name called is IMMATERIAL
14 September 2012
thank you sir. But my concern is can anybody in AGM raise an issue that since Notice was not received at regd office, the candidature will remain cancelled?
15 September 2012
thank you so much Sir for correct guidance. Please request your kind advice on my second query as well.
just a simple mention of the names is enough under 257(1) or proper candidature received should be enclosed as well. I have learnt that in listed company's too, the candidature & consent letter is not enclosed while intimating members u/s 257(1)
15 September 2012
Ther is always a differrence between PRACTICE and LAW/ACT. The intent of the ACT is very clear... it is aiming at as many details as possible. I think at least, something needs to placed on the record that the request has moved from the member and not from the company.