Investment Accounting (right entitlement)


This query is : Resolved 

21 November 2022 1.🔸 A company offered right entitlement of 3 for 5 held on that date at a premium of rupees 2 per share.

2.🔸 A company offered right entitlement at 3 for 5 held on that date at a premium of rupees 2 per share.

In terms of meaning, what is the difference between these two sentences?

Suppose if I have 10,000 shares then,

🔸(when I check my accountancy book) as per the 1st sentence, I would receive 10,000×1/5 =2,000 rights, why it's 1/5 and not 3/5? but as per the 2nd sentence, it would be 10,000×3/5=6,000

Please help 😅

09 July 2024 The difference between the two sentences lies in the interpretation of the "3 for 5" entitlement ratio.

1. **First Sentence:** "A company offered right entitlement of 3 for 5 held on that date at a premium of rupees 2 per share."

- This sentence indicates that for every 5 shares you currently hold, you are entitled to purchase 3 additional shares at a premium of Rs. 2 per share.
- So, if you have 10,000 shares, you calculate the rights entitlement as follows:
\[
\text{Rights entitlement} = \frac{10,000 \times 3}{5} = 6,000 \text{ rights}
\]

2. **Second Sentence:** "A company offered right entitlement at 3 for 5 held on that date at a premium of rupees 2 per share."

- This sentence also conveys the same entitlement ratio of 3 for 5, meaning for every 5 shares you hold, you can purchase 3 additional shares.
- Therefore, with 10,000 shares, the calculation remains the same:
\[
\text{Rights entitlement} = \frac{10,000 \times 3}{5} = 6,000 \text{ rights}
\]

### Why 3/5 in Calculation?

When you see "3 for 5" entitlement ratio, it means:

- For every 5 shares you currently hold, you have the right to buy 3 additional shares.
- The ratio "3 for 5" is typically interpreted as a fraction where the numerator (3) represents the number of rights shares you can buy, and the denominator (5) represents the number of shares you currently hold to qualify for those rights.

### Clarification on Calculation:

The confusion seems to arise from the interpretation of "3 for 5." In both sentences, the calculation for rights entitlement is correct:

- If you have 10,000 shares and the entitlement is "3 for 5," you calculate it as:
\[
\text{Rights entitlement} = \frac{10,000 \times 3}{5} = 6,000 \text{ rights}
\]

This means for every 5 shares you hold, you are entitled to 3 additional shares. Hence, with 10,000 shares, you get 6,000 rights.

Therefore, based on both sentences provided, the rights entitlement calculation should indeed be:
\[ \frac{\text{Number of shares held} \times 3}{5} \]

This formula applies universally to both sentences and aligns with the standard interpretation of "3 for 5" rights entitlement.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
23 October 2026
Sr. Accountant

SANKARAN & KRISHNAN

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
13 November 2026
Accountant

New Mobile India

Muzaffarpur

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 28 October 2026
CA- Inter and Articles

N N V Satish & Co.,

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
02 November 2026
Audit Executive

SRJP & Co LLP

Kochi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 November 2026
Tax Product Specialist

BharatX.ai

Gurgaon

B.Com

View Details
Company
31 October 2026
Accountants

sankaran and krishnan

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
15 October 2026
Senior Accountant

Continental Belting Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 October 2026
CA ARTICLE

AMKN & CO

Noida

CA Inter

View Details