Hybrid system of accounting is allowed ??
This query is : Resolved
02 August 2011
a Prop concern contractor dealing with plant set up contract job, during 2007-08 total bill RAISED to a particular debtor Rs. 2 cr 74 lacs. actual pmt received Rs. 2 cr 26 lacs on which tds deduted @1% ie,2,26,000. Concern usal practice showing income on the basis of TDS certificate, ie 2.26 cr.
Now dept issued a notice containing that company charge entire expenses on the baais of accrual basis of accounting but incomr charge on cash basis. which is not allowed and added the balance fig of Rs 38 Lacs as income and charge Interest & Penaly?
Suggest me with approprite solutions ..... please
Now dept issued a notice containing that company charge entire expenses on the baais of accrual basis of accounting but incomr charge on cash basis. which is not allowed and added the balance fig of Rs 38 Lacs as income and charge Interest & Penaly?
Suggest me with approprite solutions ..... please
02 August 2011
Even though the method of accounting adopted by the contractor is not correct yet it can be argued that the income of Rs 38.00 lacs has already been shown in the next year, so addition of Rs 38.00lac will result into double taxation for the assessee which is against the principal of natural justice.
It can further be argued by taking resort to AS-9, that the same method for revenue recognition was being consistently followed by the assessee it can not be said that the assessee has concealed any income.
Further it can be argued that the principle of prudence as per AS-1 has to be followed by the assessee.
By following the matching principle in this case, it is possible that the CIT (A)
may consider the argument and may disallow the additional expenditure incurred by the assessee in respect to the contract bills taken as income in the next financial year.
It is a matter where penalty can not be levied on the ground of available records and details with the department.
Please wait for the opinion of our experts also.
It can further be argued by taking resort to AS-9, that the same method for revenue recognition was being consistently followed by the assessee it can not be said that the assessee has concealed any income.
Further it can be argued that the principle of prudence as per AS-1 has to be followed by the assessee.
By following the matching principle in this case, it is possible that the CIT (A)
may consider the argument and may disallow the additional expenditure incurred by the assessee in respect to the contract bills taken as income in the next financial year.
It is a matter where penalty can not be levied on the ground of available records and details with the department.
Please wait for the opinion of our experts also.
Message likes :
1 times
03 August 2011
thanks sir, please mention any case law
03 August 2011
You have to file an appeal before CIT(A) for Rs.38 lacs on the ground that the addition cannot be made on the basis of regular accounting policy followed by the firm since past several years and it has been accepted by the department from time to time.
The other view has been explained by the expert and I with it.
The other view has been explained by the expert and I with it.
Message likes :
1 times
08 August 2011
thnx mr Agarwal & Mr Bafna..
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Portuguese Civil Code IT Return
- Taxability of Partnership firm for FY 2025-26
- GST Rate for Catering Services
- IS AUDIT MANDATORY IF COMMISSION INCOME IS MORE THAN 50 LAKH
- TDS AND ITR ISSUE
- EMI ISSUE IN HOUSING LOAN OLD REGIME
- TODAY INCOME TAX SITE IS NOT WORKING ANY OFFICIAL EXTENSION
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
