GST Applicable on Crash testing materials
This query is : Resolved
19 June 2020
Dear team
Our company sending some of the sample materials for crash testing due analysis testing done by Govt of India .if any GST applicable on that testing materials .Pl suggest
Our company sending some of the sample materials for crash testing due analysis testing done by Govt of India .if any GST applicable on that testing materials .Pl suggest
19 June 2020
No GST applicable on that material. Send the material under challan.
The Supreme Court Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.N. Kirpal and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri on 7-4-2000 after condoning the delay dismissed the Civil Appeal No. D2703 of 2000 filed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Kerala against the CEGAT Order Nos. 2485-2489/99, dated 21-9-1999 and reported in 2000 (126) E.L.T. 643 (Tribunal) = 1999 (9) TMI 509 - CEGAT, MADRAS (Traco Cable Company Ltd. v. Commissioner). While dismissing the appeal the Supreme Court passed the following order :
“Delay condoned.
The Civil Appeal is dismissed.”
The Appellate Tribunal in its order in question relying on its decision in the case of Collector v. General Cement Products Ltd. [1989 (39) E.L.T. 689 (Tribunal)] = 1988 (12) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI, had held that piece of cables removed from the drum used for mandatory quality control test and which get destroyed in the course of quality control test, cannot be considered as excisable goods.
The Supreme Court Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.N. Kirpal and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri on 7-4-2000 after condoning the delay dismissed the Civil Appeal No. D2703 of 2000 filed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Kerala against the CEGAT Order Nos. 2485-2489/99, dated 21-9-1999 and reported in 2000 (126) E.L.T. 643 (Tribunal) = 1999 (9) TMI 509 - CEGAT, MADRAS (Traco Cable Company Ltd. v. Commissioner). While dismissing the appeal the Supreme Court passed the following order :
“Delay condoned.
The Civil Appeal is dismissed.”
The Appellate Tribunal in its order in question relying on its decision in the case of Collector v. General Cement Products Ltd. [1989 (39) E.L.T. 689 (Tribunal)] = 1988 (12) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI, had held that piece of cables removed from the drum used for mandatory quality control test and which get destroyed in the course of quality control test, cannot be considered as excisable goods.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- Exiting partner in partnership firm in gst portal
- Type of Capital Gain
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Regarding ITR filing with more value than showing in AIS/TIS
- Average Cost Of High Quality Diamonds
- Can a single LLP in India legally operate multiple unrelated businesses (Travel, Cloud Kitchen, Ecom
- Banking Related Issue
- TAX AUDIT QUESTION
- Difff in ais receipts and gst turnover
- TDS offline utility
- TDS on rent received on hardship compensation being rent on redevelopment of building
- Housing Society-ITR5
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- PF Taxable Income
- Clarification on Tax Audit Applicability and Reporting of F&O Transactions in ITR-3
- Interest credited in FY2025-2026 & TDS therein by EPFO does not reflect in AIS or Form 26AS
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
