case study for bad debts
This query is : Resolved
31 August 2009
plz give me if possibal the case study of bad debts in which results of which comes in favour of assessee.
31 August 2009
1) CIT v. Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (2007) 289 ITR 238 (Ker): Held that,
Where the assessee could establish that there is no possibility of recovery of debts depending upon the financial position of the debtor company and write-off the same deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) shall not be denied. This position does not alter even where the debtor company is in the process of liquidation. In such cases, the AO cannot contend that the debtor company is in the process of liquidation and the assessee should have waited until the liquidation process complete to look for any possibility.
2) CIT v. T.Veerabhadra Rao, K. Koteswara Rao & Co. 155 ITR 152 (SC): Held that,
The successor of a business is entitled to claim deduction in respect of debt created by the predecessor.
3) CIT v. Hotel Ambassador (2002) 253 ITR 430 (Ker): Held that,
Bad debts claim is deductible only where it is written off in the books of account. A fresh claim of bad debt is not permissible in reassessment proceedings.
Where the assessee could establish that there is no possibility of recovery of debts depending upon the financial position of the debtor company and write-off the same deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) shall not be denied. This position does not alter even where the debtor company is in the process of liquidation. In such cases, the AO cannot contend that the debtor company is in the process of liquidation and the assessee should have waited until the liquidation process complete to look for any possibility.
2) CIT v. T.Veerabhadra Rao, K. Koteswara Rao & Co. 155 ITR 152 (SC): Held that,
The successor of a business is entitled to claim deduction in respect of debt created by the predecessor.
3) CIT v. Hotel Ambassador (2002) 253 ITR 430 (Ker): Held that,
Bad debts claim is deductible only where it is written off in the books of account. A fresh claim of bad debt is not permissible in reassessment proceedings.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- ITDS U/S.194T of Firm
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Need Professional Opinion - AY 2012-13 Old Demand & AY 2026-27 Refund Adjustment
- ITR 4 and Bank transactions
- URGENT-Eligible leaves being shown as 24 days for 3 years Articleship instead of 156 days in 108
- FCRA 6 E- Intimation
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
