Capital gain
This query is : Resolved
13 February 2014
Due to land restrictions, about purchase of property by non himachali, the assessee took advantage and stated to have sold only superstructure of a hotel property whereas he handed over the possession of entire land and superstructure. whether it is not a case of capital gain u/s 2 (47) of Act and is not a transfer ?
13 February 2014
well, you can sell the super-structure without selling the land and it would fall under capital gains. however, whether the same is allowed under laws of Himachal Pradesh or not is something that you need to be doubly sure of.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Cgst asmt - 10
- CAN a GSTIN registered under rule 14A opt for composition scheme without withdrawal from rule 14A ??
- RELATED TO ITR OF POLITICAL PARTY
- Charity work ISD
- E-Invoice applicability related question
- PTEC-payment
- Rejection of the application for the registration of a society in Andhra Pradesh state
- Journal entry of TDS operative a/c dr (under withdrawal side of bank a/c)
- Delisted shares
- Account records AI tool maintained question
- Fy 22-23 --> tyed more in gst 3b vs 2b, any interest?
- INCOME TAX QUERY FY25-26()\
- Query regarding applicability of UDIN on MCA forms signed using DSC by a Chartered Accountant
- GST ON PERSONAL MOTORCAR SOLD
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Spice form, ? mark comes in address
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- B2B Amendment
- Restoration of certificate of practice
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
