Capital gain
This query is : Resolved
13 February 2014
Due to land restrictions, about purchase of property by non himachali, the assessee took advantage and stated to have sold only superstructure of a hotel property whereas he handed over the possession of entire land and superstructure. whether it is not a case of capital gain u/s 2 (47) of Act and is not a transfer ?
13 February 2014
well, you can sell the super-structure without selling the land and it would fall under capital gains. however, whether the same is allowed under laws of Himachal Pradesh or not is something that you need to be doubly sure of.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- House Property Reporting in ITR
- Internship/Academic shown in Salary Pay Slip of a Doctor
- TDS Claim year
- Liable to deduct tds and 44ADA
- Refund of 20%pre-deposit paid for stay application
- Rent lease agreement
- TDS Challan Code
- Nomination of Bank for refund in itr 2
- Section 56(2) of the Income tax Act 1961 , Gift to relative .
- Relief u/s Section 89
- Supply through E-commerce Operators
- STCG on ETF gold & silver
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
