Vces-2013
This query is : Resolved
14 December 2013
Clarification given at S.No. (5) of Circular No. 8.82013 is, apparently, contradictory to second proviso to Section 106(1).
As the said Section does not mention the specific period it simply says ANY PERIOD whereas the clarification has specifies period : Oct 2007 to Dec 2012 and allows benefit under VCES even in cases where the SCN or ORDER cover the period prior to October, 2007.
Can dept reject in claim in such cases ?
Please clarify.
As the said Section does not mention the specific period it simply says ANY PERIOD whereas the clarification has specifies period : Oct 2007 to Dec 2012 and allows benefit under VCES even in cases where the SCN or ORDER cover the period prior to October, 2007.
Can dept reject in claim in such cases ?
Please clarify.
15 December 2013
no department cannot reject such claims. the section 105 (e) provides for the period for which service tax is covered under this scheme. So you need to read section 106 harmoniously. The clarification anyways expressly restricts the operation of 106 to the covered period only.
Message likes :
1 times
15 December 2013
many thanks,
However, Section 105(e) stipulates period in the context of TAX DUES (to be paid) and as such there is no reference to exclusions mentioned in Section 106.
Please clarify.
However, Section 105(e) stipulates period in the context of TAX DUES (to be paid) and as such there is no reference to exclusions mentioned in Section 106.
Please clarify.
15 December 2013
but there is limitation. Right?? and then there is the clarification in SR no 5. So when you read everything together, you will form the opinion the 106 shall operate within the covered period.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- TODAY INCOME TAX SITE IS NOT WORKING ANY OFFICIAL EXTENSION
- Sec 44ada applicable only or both
- IS AUDIT MANDATORY IF COMMISSION INCOME IS MORE THAN 50 LAKH
- RELATED TO TRIBUNAL APPEAL
- Portuguese Civil Code IT Return
- LIC maturity claim whether taxable
- HOUSING LOAN ISSUE
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
