Section 56(2)(viib)
This query is : Resolved
Guest
Guest
(Querist)
05 June 2014
Dear Expert,
As per section 56(2)(viib) of the Income tax act, 1961, where an individual or a Hindu undivided family receives, in any previous year, from any person or persons on or after the 1st day of October, 2009 any immovable property,—
(i) without consideration, the stamp duty value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, the stamp duty value of such property;
(ii) for a consideration which is less than the stamp duty value of the property by an amount exceeding fifty thousand rupees, the stamp duty value of such property as exceeds such consideration
are to be considered as income of such individual or HUF.
My Question is that if the said property is disputed (i.e. tenants do not vacate the property) and seller sells the property at a price lower than SDV, then what will be the tax implications ?
Pls suggest any case law.
As per section 56(2)(viib) of the Income tax act, 1961, where an individual or a Hindu undivided family receives, in any previous year, from any person or persons on or after the 1st day of October, 2009 any immovable property,—
(i) without consideration, the stamp duty value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, the stamp duty value of such property;
(ii) for a consideration which is less than the stamp duty value of the property by an amount exceeding fifty thousand rupees, the stamp duty value of such property as exceeds such consideration
are to be considered as income of such individual or HUF.
My Question is that if the said property is disputed (i.e. tenants do not vacate the property) and seller sells the property at a price lower than SDV, then what will be the tax implications ?
Pls suggest any case law.
05 June 2014
some confusion???? 56(2)(viib)isfor company.... is it 56(2)(vii) (b)....
Guest
Guest
(Querist)
05 June 2014
Sorry sir,
Its 56(2)(vii)(b)
Its 56(2)(vii)(b)
05 June 2014
Please get the stamp duty adjudicated with the Registrar of Stamp. If he does so, your purpose is served......Unfortunately no case law is available in your favour under the present scenario
Message likes :
1 times
06 June 2014
doesn't help much as stamp valuations have been very straight-jacketed and so are the tax laws for the capital gains.
please refer this article written by Gautam Nayak (a renowned tax expert) to understand that its not gonna be an easy task:
https://www.livemint.com/Money/Thui7higebdns5nJdM8EKK/Tax-on-purchase-of-immovable-property.html
please refer this article written by Gautam Nayak (a renowned tax expert) to understand that its not gonna be an easy task:
https://www.livemint.com/Money/Thui7higebdns5nJdM8EKK/Tax-on-purchase-of-immovable-property.html
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
