Section 43B
This query is : Resolved
19 August 2010
Company X had disallowed certain expenses in A.Y. 2009-10. During A.Y. 2010-2011, the business of company X was taken over by Company Y on slump sale basis. Whether Company Y can claim deduction of expenses earlier disallowed for Company X, on payment basis? Are there any related case laws?
19 August 2010
When a company is takenover it is taken over along with its losses and so on similar logic the disallowances u/s 43B takien over should be allowable on payment basis though i dont know any case laws currently but if i get some i will update it here.
Message likes :
2 times
24 August 2010
Not directly related but somewhat near.
In S.R.F. LTD. vs. GARWARE PLASTICS & POLYESTERS LTD. & ORS (1995) 128 CTR (SC) 76 : (1995) 214 ITR 678 (SC) : (1995) 80 TAXMAN 102 by the Supreme court it was decided Company—Amalgamation of companies—Before finalising the merger scheme and approving its draft scheme for merger of the sick industrial company with a healthy company, notice should be given by the BIFR to the Central Government as well to the CBDT—However, both impleaded as parties before the High Court and the Supreme Court and their counsel stating that there would be no loss of revenue to the State and benefit of s. 43B is bound to be given to a company revived on either basis—Order of amalgamation does not warrant interference.
In S.R.F. LTD. vs. GARWARE PLASTICS & POLYESTERS LTD. & ORS (1995) 128 CTR (SC) 76 : (1995) 214 ITR 678 (SC) : (1995) 80 TAXMAN 102 by the Supreme court it was decided Company—Amalgamation of companies—Before finalising the merger scheme and approving its draft scheme for merger of the sick industrial company with a healthy company, notice should be given by the BIFR to the Central Government as well to the CBDT—However, both impleaded as parties before the High Court and the Supreme Court and their counsel stating that there would be no loss of revenue to the State and benefit of s. 43B is bound to be given to a company revived on either basis—Order of amalgamation does not warrant interference.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Sales return eway bill
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
