23 July 2025
Here's a comprehensive commentary and relevant case law related to **Section 293(1)(d)** of the **Companies Act, 1956** (now largely superseded by the Companies Act, 2013):
> **Section 293(1)(d)** restricted the **Board of Directors** of a **public company (or a private company that is a subsidiary of a public company)** from **borrowing** amounts in excess of the **aggregate of its paid-up capital and free reserves**, **without prior consent of shareholders in a general meeting**.
---
### 📌 **Bare Text of Section 293(1)(d)**
> The Board of Directors of a public company shall not, except with the consent of such public company in a general meeting: > > **(d)** borrow money, **where the moneys to be borrowed together with the moneys already borrowed by the company (apart from temporary loans obtained from the company’s bankers in the ordinary course of business)** will **exceed the aggregate of the paid-up capital of the company and its free reserves** (that is to say, reserves not set apart for any specific purpose).
---
## 🔍 Key Interpretations:
### ✅ **Temporary Loans Exception**
* Temporary loans are **excluded** from the limit. * Includes: **short-term loans, cash credit, overdrafts from banks**, etc., obtained **for working capital**. * Excludes: Loans for **capital expenditure or term borrowings**.
🧾 **Case Law:**
> **K.M. Mani v. Registrar of Companies (1994) 80 Comp Cas 574 (Ker)** > Held that **temporary loans obtained from the bank** in the **ordinary course of business** do **not require shareholders’ approval**.
---
### ✅ **Free Reserves**
* Means **reserves available for distribution** as dividend (not earmarked). * **Securities premium**, **capital reserve**, **revaluation reserve**, etc., are **not considered** free reserves.
---
### ✅ **Borrowing Beyond Limit – Consequences**
* Borrowing beyond the prescribed limit **without shareholders’ approval** is **ultra vires the Board**. * The act is **not void**, but directors may be held **liable**.
🧾 **Case Law:**
> **Jai Narain Parasrampuria v. Pushpa Devi Saraf (2006) 7 SCC 756** > SC observed that **a company can ratify ultra vires borrowing** (not ultra vires the company) by passing a resolution **post-facto**, provided it falls within company powers.
---
### ✅ **Nature of Borrowing – Ordinary vs. Long-term**
* Whether borrowing is **temporary (working capital)** or **long-term (term loans)** is determined by **purpose**, not **duration**.
🧾 **Case Law:**
> **Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India (1991) 71 Comp Cas 212 (Del)** > Court held that borrowing for acquiring assets is **not temporary** and thus **requires shareholders’ approval** under Section 293(1)(d).
---
### ⚠️ Important Notes:
* This section **did not apply to private companies** (unless they were subsidiaries of public companies). * It was **mandatory** for public companies to pass an **ordinary resolution in a general meeting** for such borrowings.
---
## 🔁 Repeal & Corresponding Section in Companies Act, 2013
* **Section 293** of the 1956 Act has been replaced by **Section 180 of the Companies Act, 2013**. * Under Section 180(1)(c) of the 2013 Act:
* **Special resolution** is required (not just ordinary resolution). * Applies **only to public companies**, and now **private companies are also exempt**.
---
## 📚 Summary Table
| Topic | Description | | --------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------- | | Section | 293(1)(d), Companies Act, 1956 | | Restriction | Borrowing beyond paid-up capital + free reserves | | Exception | Temporary loans from banks in ordinary course of business | | Approval Needed | Ordinary resolution in general meeting | | Applicable To | Public companies and subsidiaries of public companies | | Corresponding Section in 2013 Act | Section 180(1)(c) – Requires **special** resolution |
---
Would you like me to draft a sample board/shareholders’ resolution or provide PDF links to relevant case laws or MCA circulars?