Sec 41(1)


This query is : Resolved 

26 March 2014 Bad recovery by successor is not considered as an income under the head PGBP p.k kaimal case. But sec 41(1) clause b clearly states that any trading loss incurred by the first person and recovered by the successor shall be considered as his income. Why then bad debt recovery not considered as income for the successor?

26 March 2014 The intention of the legislature contained in section 41(4) is the identity of the predecessor and successor should be one and the same.
In the cited case, the predecessor was a partnership firm (M/s. Thirumani Pictures) whereas the successor is Mr P.K.Kaimal, the then partner of the dissolved firm.
So Madras high court distinguished the case with section 41(4).


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 August 2026
Article Assistant

M/s.S.G.Salecha & Co.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 September 2026
Freelance Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Audit Executive

Thammana & Associates

Srikakulam

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
CA Article Assistant/CA Drop Out/Accounts Executive

PARV & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
CA Article Trainee

SR BAGAI & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Articles

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
19 September 2026
CA/Semi-CA/BCom

Pravin Sarvaiya

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details