Sec 37 (1)
This query is : Resolved
D.Sita Rama Rao
(Querist)
29 March 2014
sirs
Require the full text of the Supreme Court Decision in the case of CIT Vs Dhanrajgirji Raja Narasingirji ,(1973) 91 ITR 544,550(Sc).
Content of the Case :- No Prescriptions by the Department
It is not open to the department to prescribe what expenditure an assessee should incur and in what circumstances he should incur expenditure.Every businessman knows his interest best .
pls do provide the full text
Require the full text of the Supreme Court Decision in the case of CIT Vs Dhanrajgirji Raja Narasingirji ,(1973) 91 ITR 544,550(Sc).
Content of the Case :- No Prescriptions by the Department
It is not open to the department to prescribe what expenditure an assessee should incur and in what circumstances he should incur expenditure.Every businessman knows his interest best .
pls do provide the full text
Nikhil Kaushik
(Expert)
29 March 2014
please refer https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1218025/
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Need to correct "Whether it is last installment " response in Form 26 QB
- " Income from House Property " in joint names of co-owners
- REGARDING TDS RETURN OF FORM 27Q
- Notice under e-Verification Scheme
- GST demand notice for ITC reversal against exempted supply.
- RCM ON SECURITY CHARGES FROM INDIVIDUALS
- How to get money back from delisted company
- ITC not to be taken in accounts & GSTR-3B
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
