Notification no. 271/2007
This query is : Resolved
15 November 2007
Due to change in the valutaion of RFA will the return of income is required to be to be revised ?
15 November 2007
I REPRODUCE BELOW ONLY THE INITIAL PART OF TEXT OF THE NOTIFICATION 271/2007
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 read with sub-section (2) of section 17 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:
1.These rules may be called the Income-tax (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules, 2007.
2In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in rule 3,- (i) in sub-rule (1), for Table I, the following Table shall be substituted and shall be deemed to have been substituted with effect from the 1st day of April, 2006, namely:-
NOW THE NOTIFICATION NO 271/2007 IS DATED 7 TH NOV 2007 BUT MADE WEF 01-04-06.
BY THIS DATE OF 7 TH NOV. 2007, MAJORITY IF NOT ALL CORPORATE ASSESSEES HAVE FILED THE IT RETURNS.
EVEN CONSIDERING 15 TH NOV. 07 AS THE DATE EXTENDED BY THE MINISTRY FOR FILING IT RETURNS,IAM SURE NOT MANY OR NOR EVEN A MAJORITY OF CORP. ASSESSEES HAVE INCORPOTRATED THESE CHANGES IN VALUATION OF PERKS.
WE CAN SEE ONE MORE RETROSPECTIVE LEGISLATION WHICH THE JUDICIARY ALWAYS FROWNS ON THE INTENTION OF THE EXECUTIVE BEHIND BRINGING SUCH A RETROSPECTIVE LEGIASLATIONS WHCIH IS NOT IN BEST INTEREST OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATOR NOR THE TAX PAYER.
IF THE CBDT HAS ANY INTENTION OF EFFICIENT AND TRANSPARENT TAX ADMINISTRATION,THEY WILL NEVER ASK THE ASSESSEES TO REVISE THE IT RETURNS.
I DONT EXPECT CORPORATE INDIA ENMASS WILL FILE ANY REVISED RETURNS NOR THERE IS A DIRE NEED FOR THE SAME.
R.V.RAO
I REPRODUCE BELOW ONLY THE INITIAL PART OF TEXT OF THE NOTIFICATION 271/2007
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 read with sub-section (2) of section 17 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:
1.These rules may be called the Income-tax (Fourteenth Amendment) Rules, 2007.
2In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in rule 3,- (i) in sub-rule (1), for Table I, the following Table shall be substituted and shall be deemed to have been substituted with effect from the 1st day of April, 2006, namely:-
NOW THE NOTIFICATION NO 271/2007 IS DATED 7 TH NOV 2007 BUT MADE WEF 01-04-06.
BY THIS DATE OF 7 TH NOV. 2007, MAJORITY IF NOT ALL CORPORATE ASSESSEES HAVE FILED THE IT RETURNS.
EVEN CONSIDERING 15 TH NOV. 07 AS THE DATE EXTENDED BY THE MINISTRY FOR FILING IT RETURNS,IAM SURE NOT MANY OR NOR EVEN A MAJORITY OF CORP. ASSESSEES HAVE INCORPOTRATED THESE CHANGES IN VALUATION OF PERKS.
WE CAN SEE ONE MORE RETROSPECTIVE LEGISLATION WHICH THE JUDICIARY ALWAYS FROWNS ON THE INTENTION OF THE EXECUTIVE BEHIND BRINGING SUCH A RETROSPECTIVE LEGIASLATIONS WHCIH IS NOT IN BEST INTEREST OF THE TAX ADMINISTRATOR NOR THE TAX PAYER.
IF THE CBDT HAS ANY INTENTION OF EFFICIENT AND TRANSPARENT TAX ADMINISTRATION,THEY WILL NEVER ASK THE ASSESSEES TO REVISE THE IT RETURNS.
I DONT EXPECT CORPORATE INDIA ENMASS WILL FILE ANY REVISED RETURNS NOR THERE IS A DIRE NEED FOR THE SAME.
R.V.RAO
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- Carriage Road Act, 2007 read with Carriage by Road Rules, 2011
- Same demand raised for original as well as rectification request return
- Sale of property held jointly with a non resident Indian
- RELATED TO TRIBUNAL APPEAL
- Need Professional Opinion - AY 2012-13 Old Demand & AY 2026-27 Refund Adjustment
- ITR 4 and Bank transactions
- IS AUDIT MANDATORY IF COMMISSION INCOME IS MORE THAN 50 LAKH
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- Journal entry of busniess expenses
- Cash balance limit and property purchases limit
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
