Negotiable Instrument
This query is : Resolved
29 January 2017
the words written in promissory note "I promise to pay myself" is invalid
but when this promissory note is endorsed blank i.e. ( transferred by not signing in it )
then it becomes payable to the endorsee or his order ; if endorsed specially
why? what is the reason behind?
Message likes :
1 times
03 August 2024
In the context of negotiable instruments, specifically promissory notes, understanding the implications of endorsements and the wording of the instrument is crucial. Here’s a breakdown of the key points related to your query:
### **1. Validity of Promissory Note with "I promise to pay myself"**
- **Wording Issue**:
- The phrase "I promise to pay myself" is problematic because a promissory note must involve a promise to pay a specific person or bearer. In other words, the promise should be made to a third party, not to oneself. The primary function of a promissory note is to create a financial obligation from the maker to the payee.
- **Legal Validity**:
- A promissory note that says "I promise to pay myself" does not meet the standard requirements for negotiability because it lacks a clear payee. According to the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in India) or similar laws in other jurisdictions, a valid promissory note must specify a payee, which can be a person, a bearer, or order of a person.
### **2. Endorsement and Transfer**
- **Blank Endorsement**:
- If a promissory note is endorsed blank (i.e., the endorser simply signs their name without specifying a new payee), it becomes payable to the bearer of the instrument. This is because a blank endorsement transfers the right to the bearer and makes it negotiable to anyone who holds the instrument.
- **Special Endorsement**:
- A special endorsement occurs when the endorser specifies a particular person to whom the instrument is payable. For example, if the endorsement is "Pay to John Doe," the note becomes payable only to John Doe or his order. This restricts the negotiability to the specified endorsee.
### **Reason Behind Endorsement Effects**
- **Promissory Note Dynamics**:
- **Blank Endorsement**: Makes the instrument payable to whoever holds it, thus enhancing its negotiability. This is particularly useful for transferring the instrument easily without naming the new payee.
- **Special Endorsement**: Limits the instrument's negotiability to the person named, adding a layer of specificity and security regarding who has the right to enforce the note.
- **Legal Framework**:
- **Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881** (India): Provides that a promissory note must be payable to a specific person or bearer, and the validity and transferability depend on whether it meets these requirements. Endorsements are governed by the provisions related to the transfer and negotiation of such instruments.
### **Conclusion**
- **Invalid Promissory Note**: A promissory note that promises to pay oneself is invalid due to lack of a clear third-party payee.
- **Impact of Endorsement**: Endorsing the note either blank or specially affects its negotiability and the rights of the holder. A blank endorsement makes it payable to the bearer, while a special endorsement designates a specific payee.
For further clarification and to ensure compliance with local laws, consulting a legal expert or financial advisor specializing in negotiable instruments is advisable.
### **1. Validity of Promissory Note with "I promise to pay myself"**
- **Wording Issue**:
- The phrase "I promise to pay myself" is problematic because a promissory note must involve a promise to pay a specific person or bearer. In other words, the promise should be made to a third party, not to oneself. The primary function of a promissory note is to create a financial obligation from the maker to the payee.
- **Legal Validity**:
- A promissory note that says "I promise to pay myself" does not meet the standard requirements for negotiability because it lacks a clear payee. According to the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in India) or similar laws in other jurisdictions, a valid promissory note must specify a payee, which can be a person, a bearer, or order of a person.
### **2. Endorsement and Transfer**
- **Blank Endorsement**:
- If a promissory note is endorsed blank (i.e., the endorser simply signs their name without specifying a new payee), it becomes payable to the bearer of the instrument. This is because a blank endorsement transfers the right to the bearer and makes it negotiable to anyone who holds the instrument.
- **Special Endorsement**:
- A special endorsement occurs when the endorser specifies a particular person to whom the instrument is payable. For example, if the endorsement is "Pay to John Doe," the note becomes payable only to John Doe or his order. This restricts the negotiability to the specified endorsee.
### **Reason Behind Endorsement Effects**
- **Promissory Note Dynamics**:
- **Blank Endorsement**: Makes the instrument payable to whoever holds it, thus enhancing its negotiability. This is particularly useful for transferring the instrument easily without naming the new payee.
- **Special Endorsement**: Limits the instrument's negotiability to the person named, adding a layer of specificity and security regarding who has the right to enforce the note.
- **Legal Framework**:
- **Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881** (India): Provides that a promissory note must be payable to a specific person or bearer, and the validity and transferability depend on whether it meets these requirements. Endorsements are governed by the provisions related to the transfer and negotiation of such instruments.
### **Conclusion**
- **Invalid Promissory Note**: A promissory note that promises to pay oneself is invalid due to lack of a clear third-party payee.
- **Impact of Endorsement**: Endorsing the note either blank or specially affects its negotiability and the rights of the holder. A blank endorsement makes it payable to the bearer, while a special endorsement designates a specific payee.
For further clarification and to ensure compliance with local laws, consulting a legal expert or financial advisor specializing in negotiable instruments is advisable.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITR 3 VALIDATION
- Brokage income from sale and purchase of property
- Error while validating
- 44AD business and F&O loss
- Purchase of Time Deposit in AIS
- UNUTILISED CAPITAL GAIN FD
- Regarding Trading & Investment in Shares and MF in the context of Income tax return
- Reporting sale value mismatch for share transaction
- Correction in filed Form 27Q - showing error due to deductee contact number
- LTCG EXEMPTION AND TAX APPLICABILITY
- Accounting entry for instalment payments and gst obigations
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Composition Dealer GST Annual Return Filing process
- Stamp Duty & Registration Fees on Sale Deed
- GST on Restaurant service
- Revision under Section 264 in The Income Tax Act, 1961
- TDS under section 195.
- Filing GST Returns after death of proprietor
- Registered Required in GST Act
- Switch over to Composition Scheme
Trending Online Classes
-
Input Tax Credit, GST refunds and Recovery of refunds- Roadblocks and way outs
CA Nipun Arora03 September 2025 -
GST LIVE Certification Course - 43rd Weekdays Batch(With Govt Certificate)
Industry Expert15 September 2025
CAclubindia
