Income Tax on Bonus Shares
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
25 May 2010
I had Unitech share cert no. 19763 for 100 equity shares having face value of Rs. 10/- each on 1.7.1990 ( transfer Caswe)and the said shares demated by me on .19.06.2006
100 shares of face value of Rs. 10/- each were subdivided to face value Rs. 2/- each on 1st July 2006, 500 shares of face value of 2/- each were credited to my demat account No. 41185123 against my holding of 100 share of face value of Rs. 10/- each as on record date i.e. 30.06.2006.
2. 6000 shares were allotted as Bonus shares to me on 1st July, 2006 in the ratio of 12:1 and credit of which was given to my demat account in the 2nd week of July, 2006. After 2 months I sold all the shares. What will be my Tax liability?
Kindly help me out, here I am not able to get clear answer. My case is in appeal. Kindly take it seriously.
100 shares of face value of Rs. 10/- each were subdivided to face value Rs. 2/- each on 1st July 2006, 500 shares of face value of 2/- each were credited to my demat account No. 41185123 against my holding of 100 share of face value of Rs. 10/- each as on record date i.e. 30.06.2006.
2. 6000 shares were allotted as Bonus shares to me on 1st July, 2006 in the ratio of 12:1 and credit of which was given to my demat account in the 2nd week of July, 2006. After 2 months I sold all the shares. What will be my Tax liability?
Kindly help me out, here I am not able to get clear answer. My case is in appeal. Kindly take it seriously.
25 May 2010
DEAR ANJANA
YOUR TAX LIABILITY WOULD BE ON THE DIFF BETWEEN
SALE PROCEEDS OF THE SHARES
LESS INDEXED COT OF THE ACQUISITION
CAPITAL GAINS
COST INCURRED FOR THE BONUS SHARES IS NIL, SO ITS COST IS ASSUMED AS NIL.
YOUR TAX LIABILITY WOULD BE ON THE DIFF BETWEEN
SALE PROCEEDS OF THE SHARES
LESS INDEXED COT OF THE ACQUISITION
CAPITAL GAINS
COST INCURRED FOR THE BONUS SHARES IS NIL, SO ITS COST IS ASSUMED AS NIL.
25 May 2010
Agree with Expert. The entire consideration on the bonus shares (6000 shares) would be short term capital gain and has to be taxed accordingly.
Whereas on the original shares (500 shares of Rs. 2 FV), the consideration would be long term capital gain and exempt from any tax.
Whereas on the original shares (500 shares of Rs. 2 FV), the consideration would be long term capital gain and exempt from any tax.
25 May 2010
Agreed with Mr. Rasesh.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- EXPORT COMMERCIAL INVOICE HSN CODE
- Cash balance limit and property purchases limit
- Can we choose not to report losses in ITR3 if they cannot be carried forward?
- LIC maturity claim whether taxable
- Bank details not Visible on Traces Portal
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
