Huf income vrs personal income
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
03 February 2013
SIR,
CAN CAPITAL GAINS ARISING FROM THE SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPRTY OTHER THAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IN TWO DIFFERENT CONSECUTIVE F.Y.'S BE INVESTED IN THE PURCHASE OF A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL HOUSE/FLAT IF THE TIMING IS COMPLIES WITH SECTION 54F. WILL THE I.T. DEPT. GIVE EXEMPTION IF THE PURCHASE OF RES. FLAT IS DONE/SH SOLELY IN THE NAME OF SPOUSE.ESP. IF I CAN SHOW THAT I TRANSFERRED MONEY FROM MY BANK A/C TO WIFE'S ACCOUNT AND THE SAME WAS UTILISED FOR PURCHASING THE RES. PROPERTY.
CAN CAPITAL GAINS ARISING FROM THE SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPRTY OTHER THAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IN TWO DIFFERENT CONSECUTIVE F.Y.'S BE INVESTED IN THE PURCHASE OF A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL HOUSE/FLAT IF THE TIMING IS COMPLIES WITH SECTION 54F. WILL THE I.T. DEPT. GIVE EXEMPTION IF THE PURCHASE OF RES. FLAT IS DONE/SH SOLELY IN THE NAME OF SPOUSE.ESP. IF I CAN SHOW THAT I TRANSFERRED MONEY FROM MY BANK A/C TO WIFE'S ACCOUNT AND THE SAME WAS UTILISED FOR PURCHASING THE RES. PROPERTY.
03 February 2013
1. IN THIS CASE YOU SHOULD NOT BE OWNING MORE THAN ONE RESIDENTIAL HOUSE-
.
2. BENEFIT AGAINST A SINGLE PROPERTY IS NOT DENIED U/S 54F-AS TIMINGS MENTIONED IN THE SECTION ARE IN YOUR FAVOUR.
.
3. NEW PROPERTY CAN BE PURCHASED IN WIFE'S NAME -BUT WILL BE SHOWN IN YOUR BALANCE SHEET. IN A CASE OF SECTION 54, CIT V NATRAJAN (2006) 154 TAXMANN , MADRAS HIGH COURT HAS GIVEN DECISION IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE.
4. IN MY VIEW , YOU MUST NOT TAKE DOUBLE RISKS OF IN-LAWS-
R1.INCOME-TAX LAW
R2.IN-LAWS.
AND ADD YOUR NAME ALSO. (FORGET THE CONCESSIONS TO LADIES IN STAMP DUTY, IF THERE BE ANY, IN YOUR STATE.)
.
.
2. BENEFIT AGAINST A SINGLE PROPERTY IS NOT DENIED U/S 54F-AS TIMINGS MENTIONED IN THE SECTION ARE IN YOUR FAVOUR.
.
3. NEW PROPERTY CAN BE PURCHASED IN WIFE'S NAME -BUT WILL BE SHOWN IN YOUR BALANCE SHEET. IN A CASE OF SECTION 54, CIT V NATRAJAN (2006) 154 TAXMANN , MADRAS HIGH COURT HAS GIVEN DECISION IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE.
4. IN MY VIEW , YOU MUST NOT TAKE DOUBLE RISKS OF IN-LAWS-
R1.INCOME-TAX LAW
R2.IN-LAWS.
AND ADD YOUR NAME ALSO. (FORGET THE CONCESSIONS TO LADIES IN STAMP DUTY, IF THERE BE ANY, IN YOUR STATE.)
.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- CAPITAL GAIN REDEVELOPED FLAT
- CLOSING STOCK QUERY
- Requirement under FEMA &RBI
- REGARDING ITR FILING QUESTION
- Gst reverse charge mechanism to be claimed in the month of payment
- Itr processing refund
- Multiple payment of self assessment tax for A Y 2025-2026
- Query regarding TDS on EPFO Higher Pension Arrears- under wrong section
- ITC BENEFIT ON BROKRAGE PAID
- Technical Glitch in ITR-4 Online Form (AY 2026-27): Sec 44AE Partner Remuneration not mapping to E8
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
- Query regarding reporting of exempt foreign remuneration in ITR (AY 2026-27)
- FEMA/RBI treatment — Amazon.ca arbitrage (US buy, Canada sell, goods never enter India)
- Goods return by customer
- INWARD REMITTANCE FOREIGN
- CPC and SAC
- Account freezed for Ineligible ITC Scrutiny for GST Annual Return
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
