Huf income vrs personal income
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
03 February 2013
SIR,
CAN CAPITAL GAINS ARISING FROM THE SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPRTY OTHER THAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IN TWO DIFFERENT CONSECUTIVE F.Y.'S BE INVESTED IN THE PURCHASE OF A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL HOUSE/FLAT IF THE TIMING IS COMPLIES WITH SECTION 54F. WILL THE I.T. DEPT. GIVE EXEMPTION IF THE PURCHASE OF RES. FLAT IS DONE/SH SOLELY IN THE NAME OF SPOUSE.ESP. IF I CAN SHOW THAT I TRANSFERRED MONEY FROM MY BANK A/C TO WIFE'S ACCOUNT AND THE SAME WAS UTILISED FOR PURCHASING THE RES. PROPERTY.
CAN CAPITAL GAINS ARISING FROM THE SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPRTY OTHER THAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IN TWO DIFFERENT CONSECUTIVE F.Y.'S BE INVESTED IN THE PURCHASE OF A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL HOUSE/FLAT IF THE TIMING IS COMPLIES WITH SECTION 54F. WILL THE I.T. DEPT. GIVE EXEMPTION IF THE PURCHASE OF RES. FLAT IS DONE/SH SOLELY IN THE NAME OF SPOUSE.ESP. IF I CAN SHOW THAT I TRANSFERRED MONEY FROM MY BANK A/C TO WIFE'S ACCOUNT AND THE SAME WAS UTILISED FOR PURCHASING THE RES. PROPERTY.
03 February 2013
1. IN THIS CASE YOU SHOULD NOT BE OWNING MORE THAN ONE RESIDENTIAL HOUSE-
.
2. BENEFIT AGAINST A SINGLE PROPERTY IS NOT DENIED U/S 54F-AS TIMINGS MENTIONED IN THE SECTION ARE IN YOUR FAVOUR.
.
3. NEW PROPERTY CAN BE PURCHASED IN WIFE'S NAME -BUT WILL BE SHOWN IN YOUR BALANCE SHEET. IN A CASE OF SECTION 54, CIT V NATRAJAN (2006) 154 TAXMANN , MADRAS HIGH COURT HAS GIVEN DECISION IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE.
4. IN MY VIEW , YOU MUST NOT TAKE DOUBLE RISKS OF IN-LAWS-
R1.INCOME-TAX LAW
R2.IN-LAWS.
AND ADD YOUR NAME ALSO. (FORGET THE CONCESSIONS TO LADIES IN STAMP DUTY, IF THERE BE ANY, IN YOUR STATE.)
.
.
2. BENEFIT AGAINST A SINGLE PROPERTY IS NOT DENIED U/S 54F-AS TIMINGS MENTIONED IN THE SECTION ARE IN YOUR FAVOUR.
.
3. NEW PROPERTY CAN BE PURCHASED IN WIFE'S NAME -BUT WILL BE SHOWN IN YOUR BALANCE SHEET. IN A CASE OF SECTION 54, CIT V NATRAJAN (2006) 154 TAXMANN , MADRAS HIGH COURT HAS GIVEN DECISION IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE.
4. IN MY VIEW , YOU MUST NOT TAKE DOUBLE RISKS OF IN-LAWS-
R1.INCOME-TAX LAW
R2.IN-LAWS.
AND ADD YOUR NAME ALSO. (FORGET THE CONCESSIONS TO LADIES IN STAMP DUTY, IF THERE BE ANY, IN YOUR STATE.)
.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- TDS on Consultancy- Non DTAA
- Depreciation of fixed assets- coop housing society in mumbai
- Reopen of assessment proceeding
- Experts need help
- EPF FULL & FINAL RULES IN 2026
- Management System (IMS)
- Foreign lottery ticket bought online from India: legality, tax and consequences
- Gift Received from nonblood relative
- COMMERCIAL INVOICE FOR MATERIAL AND FREIGHT
- EXPORT BILL UNDER LUT FREIGHT CHARGE INCLUED IN INVOICE IT LIABLE TO TAX
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
