Dividend dist tax on pvt. co.
This query is : Resolved
13 September 2011
ABC Pvt Ltd. decalares dividend (XYZ pvt ltd. is a shareholder) and pays dividend Distr. tax
XYZ receives dividend and also declares dividend and pays dividend to PQR pvt ltd. but does not pay Dividend dist tax
PQR pvt ltd. received dividend and also declares dividend but does not pays DDT
XYZ and PQR says as dividend tax is already paid by ABC therefore, they are not liable to pay DDT again on the dividend declared by them.
IS IT Correct ?
XYZ receives dividend and also declares dividend and pays dividend to PQR pvt ltd. but does not pay Dividend dist tax
PQR pvt ltd. received dividend and also declares dividend but does not pays DDT
XYZ and PQR says as dividend tax is already paid by ABC therefore, they are not liable to pay DDT again on the dividend declared by them.
IS IT Correct ?
13 September 2011
The DDT is payable by a domestic company on the distribution of Dividend whether it is interim dividend or final dividend and whether paid out of current profit or accumulated profit.
The cascading effect of DDT is mitigated up to one level w.e.f. 1.4.08. The DDT paid on the dividend received from its subsidiary company is deductible from the dividend declared by the holding company and DDT is payable on the net dividend. The subsidiary company means the holder of more than 50% sharecapital of other company.
However, certain conditions are required to be fulfiled by the Holding company to claim the deduction of DDT.
One of the conditions is that the assessee company is not a subsidiary company of any other company. Subject to this condition, it is settled that XYZ Ltd will have to pay DDT as it is the subsidiary of PQR Ltd but not to be paid by M/s PQR Ltd as PQR ltd is not a subsidiary company of any other company. All this interpritation is subject to the fact that the holding of XYZ Ltd and PQR Ltd is 50% or more of the share capital.
The cascading effect of DDT is mitigated up to one level w.e.f. 1.4.08. The DDT paid on the dividend received from its subsidiary company is deductible from the dividend declared by the holding company and DDT is payable on the net dividend. The subsidiary company means the holder of more than 50% sharecapital of other company.
However, certain conditions are required to be fulfiled by the Holding company to claim the deduction of DDT.
One of the conditions is that the assessee company is not a subsidiary company of any other company. Subject to this condition, it is settled that XYZ Ltd will have to pay DDT as it is the subsidiary of PQR Ltd but not to be paid by M/s PQR Ltd as PQR ltd is not a subsidiary company of any other company. All this interpritation is subject to the fact that the holding of XYZ Ltd and PQR Ltd is 50% or more of the share capital.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax Audit u/s 44AB for Transport Business A proprietorship is engaged in transportation business and
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
