Deposit or loan
This query is : Resolved
23 November 2013
An unlisted public company's director has brought in cash in the company. Whether it should be treated as loan or deposit?
23 November 2013
Purely loan, no question of deposit for such amount
Message likes :
1 times
23 November 2013
It will be treated as loan and it will not be considered as deposit, because loan taken from director is not considered as deposit.
Message likes :
1 times
23 November 2013
Providing finance to the company may not be considered as or equated to sale of goods or materials to the company. So also, the same would not tantamount to supply of any services by a director to the company. The consent of the Board of directors pursuant to section 297 would not, therefore, be required. Whereas providing funds to the company may not be considered as a contract falling u/s 297, the same is definitely an arrangement in which director is directly or indirectly interested or concerned and therefore, the disclosure pursuant to section 299 would invariably be required to be made to the Board of directors of the company. Even after disclosing his interest, the concerned director should not take undue advantage because his position is very much like that of a trustee as was held in Kashinath v New Alok Ginning & Pressing Co. Ltd. (1950) 20 Comp Cas 225 (Nag).
Providing finance to the company may not be considered as or equated to sale of goods or materials to the company. So also, the same would not tantamount to supply of any services by a director to the company. The consent of the Board of directors pursuant to section 297 would not, therefore, be required. Whereas providing funds to the company may not be considered as a contract falling u/s 297, the same is definitely an arrangement in which director is directly or indirectly interested or concerned and therefore, the disclosure pursuant to section 299 would invariably be required to be made to the Board of directors of the company. Even after disclosing his interest, the concerned director should not take undue advantage because his position is very much like that of a trustee as was held in Kashinath v New Alok Ginning & Pressing Co. Ltd. (1950) 20 Comp Cas 225 (Nag).
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- About TDS & Income Tax
- Pass word to open justification report for Q1 for FY 2026-27
- PPF interest-As Exempt Income disclosure
- Section 194JA & JB Income which ITR Form to use
- Scrutiny and reopening of past returns
- Type of Capital Gain
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Booth for sales promotion
- Difference in GSTR3B system generated which is correct and actual Payment it asks
- GST ON TRAVELLING BILLS
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- PF Taxable Income
- Clarification on Tax Audit Applicability and Reporting of F&O Transactions in ITR-3
- Interest credited in FY2025-2026 & TDS therein by EPFO does not reflect in AIS or Form 26AS
- 44ad eligble money lending interest
- Taxation in the hands of Landowner under JDA
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
