Works Contract (composition Scheme)
This query is : Resolved
06 June 2009
Hi,
I have a query on the above mentioned subject matter. the contractor is executing construction contract in the state of Karnataka.
My Query is that under the KVAT 2003 WCT Composition Scheme the contratcor does not require to include the URD purchases made in executing the contract. Does this provision still exist or do we need to inclue the URD purchases in the taxable turnover?
Secondly the dealer executing the WCT Composition scheme is not permitted to make any interstate purchases? has there been any amendmend to this provision?
Kindly Reply to these queries?
Regards
CA K.P.Vinu Iyer
I have a query on the above mentioned subject matter. the contractor is executing construction contract in the state of Karnataka.
My Query is that under the KVAT 2003 WCT Composition Scheme the contratcor does not require to include the URD purchases made in executing the contract. Does this provision still exist or do we need to inclue the URD purchases in the taxable turnover?
Secondly the dealer executing the WCT Composition scheme is not permitted to make any interstate purchases? has there been any amendmend to this provision?
Kindly Reply to these queries?
Regards
CA K.P.Vinu Iyer
07 June 2009
There have been a number of changes. A current book maybe referred.
The URD purchases by the contractor would be liable for payment of VAT under Section 3 itslef.
WCT is eligible for either a compistion or regular and in case of regular scheme this makes no differecne. Interstate purchases can be made but I think the same should be subjected to state Vat.
The URD purchases by the contractor would be liable for payment of VAT under Section 3 itslef.
WCT is eligible for either a compistion or regular and in case of regular scheme this makes no differecne. Interstate purchases can be made but I think the same should be subjected to state Vat.
07 June 2009
There have been a number of changes. A current book maybe referred.
The URD purchases by the contractor would be liable for payment of VAT under Section 3 itslef.
WCT is eligible for either a compistion or regular and in case of regular scheme this makes no differecne. Interstate purchases can be made but I think the same should be subjected to state Vat.
The URD purchases by the contractor would be liable for payment of VAT under Section 3 itslef.
WCT is eligible for either a compistion or regular and in case of regular scheme this makes no differecne. Interstate purchases can be made but I think the same should be subjected to state Vat.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- Regarding TDS Applicability For Director Remuneration
- Value of property in capital gain
- Multiple trade mark
- Regarding appeal to GSTAT
- Copyright software
- LC charges in relation to Asset purchased should be Capitalised ?
- Transporter Declaration form
- SALE OF MOTOR CAR BY REGISTERED INDIVIDUAL
- Taxation on Swing Trading Income (No Other Income)
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
