Whole Time Director
This query is : Resolved
Rishi Vyas
(Querist)
13 November 2010
Company A had one WTD who resigned on 29.01.2009 and another WTD was appointed on 15.05.2009. There was vacancy for four months.
Did the Company violate any of the provisions of Companies Act by not appointing or having any WTD for four months?
Regards
Rishi
Did the Company violate any of the provisions of Companies Act by not appointing or having any WTD for four months?
Regards
Rishi
Ajay Mishra
(Expert)
13 November 2010
Hi
Yes, If a company fall under section 269 of the Companies Act, 1956,the company shall have MD/WTD.
The applicability start when you come under the purview of this section.
Regards
Yes, If a company fall under section 269 of the Companies Act, 1956,the company shall have MD/WTD.
The applicability start when you come under the purview of this section.
Regards
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Need to correct "Whether it is last installment " response in Form 26 QB
- " Income from House Property " in joint names of co-owners
- REGARDING TDS RETURN OF FORM 27Q
- Notice under e-Verification Scheme
- GST demand notice for ITC reversal against exempted supply.
- RCM ON SECURITY CHARGES FROM INDIVIDUALS
- How to get money back from delisted company
- ITC not to be taken in accounts & GSTR-3B
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
