Whole Time Director
This query is : Resolved
13 November 2010
Company A had one WTD who resigned on 29.01.2009 and another WTD was appointed on 15.05.2009. There was vacancy for four months.
Did the Company violate any of the provisions of Companies Act by not appointing or having any WTD for four months?
Regards
Rishi
Did the Company violate any of the provisions of Companies Act by not appointing or having any WTD for four months?
Regards
Rishi
13 November 2010
Hi
Yes, If a company fall under section 269 of the Companies Act, 1956,the company shall have MD/WTD.
The applicability start when you come under the purview of this section.
Regards
Yes, If a company fall under section 269 of the Companies Act, 1956,the company shall have MD/WTD.
The applicability start when you come under the purview of this section.
Regards
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITR-Capital Gain
- Gst on travel by air for business purposes
- CLOSING STOCK QUERY
- Loss of interest in PF transfer from EPFO to Trust
- Residential status of non resident
- TDS _Long term Capital Gain ref.sec 214 Table 2
- Can a single LLP in India legally operate multiple unrelated businesses (Travel, Cloud Kitchen, Ecom
- IT returns for fresh job holders
- Query regarding reporting of exempt foreign remuneration in ITR
- GST ISD Query on various AMCs
- Gst reverse charge mechanism to be claimed in the month of payment
- Itr processing refund
- U/S 194 T
- TDS refund Indemnity Bond
- ITC BENEFIT ON BROKRAGE PAID
- PF wage ceiling
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
