Serial number issue in part ii
This query is : Resolved
18 April 2013
Regarding Cenvat Input Register. As per Excise rule separate register is required for Capital and Non Capital,please confirm wheter serial number should be in continue in case of Capital register and Non capital register as our software genrating serial numbers for consolidated list (Cpaital and non capital) ?
Example : Cenvat Register
Serial Number
1 (Non Capital)
2 (Capital)
3 (non -Capital)
4 (non-Capital)
Now when we print the Cenvat input register for Capital it show serial 2
For Non Capital =1,3, and 4 Please confirm whether it is correct or not
Example : Cenvat Register
Serial Number
1 (Non Capital)
2 (Capital)
3 (non -Capital)
4 (non-Capital)
Now when we print the Cenvat input register for Capital it show serial 2
For Non Capital =1,3, and 4 Please confirm whether it is correct or not
29 April 2013
No Response !!!!
23 July 2025
Your query pertains to the **Cenvat Input Register** and whether **serial numbers** for **capital goods** and **non-capital goods** can be **consolidated** or must be **separate and continuous** under Excise Rules.
---
### ✅ Clarification:
As per **Central Excise Rules**, especially Rule 9(5) of the **CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004**, and the general documentation and record-keeping provisions:
* **Separate registers** are to be maintained for **capital goods** and **inputs (non-capital goods)**.
* However, there is **no specific requirement** in the rules that **serial numbers** must be **independent or continuous** **within each category only** (i.e., no requirement that serial numbers start from 1 separately for capital and non-capital).
---
### 🔍 Your Example:
| Serial Number | Type |
| ------------- | ----------- |
| 1 | Non-Capital |
| 2 | Capital |
| 3 | Non-Capital |
| 4 | Non-Capital |
If the software generates a **consolidated serial number** (i.e., a running number across both capital and non-capital goods), and then when printing separate registers the serial numbers **reflect this consolidated sequence**, **it is acceptable**, provided:
1. **Separate registers/prints** are still maintained for inputs and capital goods.
2. **Details are clear and traceable**.
3. The records are **not misleading** and can be **easily reconciled** during audit.
---
### ✅ Conclusion:
Yes, your software-generated format is **correct and acceptable** under Excise rules **as long as**:
* Capital and non-capital registers are printed separately.
* The serial numbers, though consolidated, clearly identify the nature of goods.
**No violation of rules** arises due to such serial number logic, and this approach is common in automated accounting/ERP systems.
Let me know if you want a suggested format or sample layout for both registers.
---
### ✅ Clarification:
As per **Central Excise Rules**, especially Rule 9(5) of the **CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004**, and the general documentation and record-keeping provisions:
* **Separate registers** are to be maintained for **capital goods** and **inputs (non-capital goods)**.
* However, there is **no specific requirement** in the rules that **serial numbers** must be **independent or continuous** **within each category only** (i.e., no requirement that serial numbers start from 1 separately for capital and non-capital).
---
### 🔍 Your Example:
| Serial Number | Type |
| ------------- | ----------- |
| 1 | Non-Capital |
| 2 | Capital |
| 3 | Non-Capital |
| 4 | Non-Capital |
If the software generates a **consolidated serial number** (i.e., a running number across both capital and non-capital goods), and then when printing separate registers the serial numbers **reflect this consolidated sequence**, **it is acceptable**, provided:
1. **Separate registers/prints** are still maintained for inputs and capital goods.
2. **Details are clear and traceable**.
3. The records are **not misleading** and can be **easily reconciled** during audit.
---
### ✅ Conclusion:
Yes, your software-generated format is **correct and acceptable** under Excise rules **as long as**:
* Capital and non-capital registers are printed separately.
* The serial numbers, though consolidated, clearly identify the nature of goods.
**No violation of rules** arises due to such serial number logic, and this approach is common in automated accounting/ERP systems.
Let me know if you want a suggested format or sample layout for both registers.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- House Property Reporting in ITR
- TDS Claim year
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- Supply through E-commerce Operators
- Rent lease agreement
- TDS Challan Code
- Relief u/s Section 89
- REGARDING SECTION 44AE
- Is it compulsory to File 10E if Income including Pension Arrears is below 12 Lakh for the F Y 25 26
- Suggestions required for income tax filing-software (FY 2025-26)
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
