Regarding Cash payments to sundry creditors
This query is : Resolved
03 October 2025
Respected Colleagues,
One of my client (Pvt Ltd) in previous years paid sundry creditors in cash all above 10k, and but in actual no creditors has been o/s in books, but due to cash payments made, auditor disallowes the same and treated that no payment has been made, now my ques is, there any wayout to disclose actual value of creditors in balance sheet of FY 2024-25 or may be next year balance sheet?
please guide
One of my client (Pvt Ltd) in previous years paid sundry creditors in cash all above 10k, and but in actual no creditors has been o/s in books, but due to cash payments made, auditor disallowes the same and treated that no payment has been made, now my ques is, there any wayout to disclose actual value of creditors in balance sheet of FY 2024-25 or may be next year balance sheet?
please guide
03 October 2025
If a Private Limited Company made cash payments exceeding ₹10,000 to sundry creditors, such payments are disallowed as a business expense under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, unless certain exceptions are met. Additionally, Section 40A(3A) provides that if expenses were booked earlier but paid this year in cash above the limit, the disallowed amount is added to the current year’s taxable business income.
The company cannot reopen and revise already adopted financial statements for prior years according to ICAI guidance. Once the accounts for a year are adopted at the AGM, revision is only permissible in rare circumstances—not for typical audit disallowances.
The company cannot reopen and revise already adopted financial statements for prior years according to ICAI guidance. Once the accounts for a year are adopted at the AGM, revision is only permissible in rare circumstances—not for typical audit disallowances.
03 October 2025
The actual position of creditors should reflect the genuine outstanding amount as of March 31, 2025, based on current records, not retrospectively to disclose old transactions.
If there were no real sundry creditors outstanding as per physical records, then the balance sheet should show nil sundry creditors as of the current year-end. Artificially inflating the sundry creditors figure to match cash outflows already disallowed would not be correct accounting or compliant with disclosure requirements.
The amounts disallowed under audit will remain added back to taxable profit as per income tax compliance, but this does not mandate or justify a corresponding creditor liability in the books once the liability is actually settled and does not exist at year-end.
If there were no real sundry creditors outstanding as per physical records, then the balance sheet should show nil sundry creditors as of the current year-end. Artificially inflating the sundry creditors figure to match cash outflows already disallowed would not be correct accounting or compliant with disclosure requirements.
The amounts disallowed under audit will remain added back to taxable profit as per income tax compliance, but this does not mandate or justify a corresponding creditor liability in the books once the liability is actually settled and does not exist at year-end.
03 October 2025
For FY 2024-25 or subsequent years, only actual creditors outstanding as per books on the last day of the financial year should be disclosed in the balance sheet.
For transparency, auditor’s notes can explain the nature of past cash payments and the resulting audit disallowance, but the closing balance sheet value must represent the true and fair position of outstanding creditors.
If the situation resulted from factually incorrect prior year reporting, a note can be included regarding the auditor’s qualification and management explanation, but past creditors cannot be artificially shown as payable in future balance sheets.
For transparency, auditor’s notes can explain the nature of past cash payments and the resulting audit disallowance, but the closing balance sheet value must represent the true and fair position of outstanding creditors.
If the situation resulted from factually incorrect prior year reporting, a note can be included regarding the auditor’s qualification and management explanation, but past creditors cannot be artificially shown as payable in future balance sheets.
03 October 2025
For FY 2024-25 or subsequent years, only actual creditors outstanding as per books on the last day of the financial year should be disclosed in the balance sheet.
For transparency, auditor’s notes can explain the nature of past cash payments and the resulting audit disallowance, but the closing balance sheet value must represent the true and fair position of outstanding creditors.
If the situation resulted from factually incorrect prior year reporting, a note can be included regarding the auditor’s qualification and management explanation, but past creditors cannot be artificially shown as payable in future balance sheets.
For transparency, auditor’s notes can explain the nature of past cash payments and the resulting audit disallowance, but the closing balance sheet value must represent the true and fair position of outstanding creditors.
If the situation resulted from factually incorrect prior year reporting, a note can be included regarding the auditor’s qualification and management explanation, but past creditors cannot be artificially shown as payable in future balance sheets.
03 October 2025
Rectify by Non-Cash Repayment:
Issue an account payee cheque/bank transfer to the party in place of the earlier cash payment within the permissible period. Submit revised documentation to the Assessing Officer at the time of assessment.
Appeal by Demonstrating Genuine Circumstance:
If payment mode cannot be changed, provide all supporting evidence to claim eligibility under Rule 6DD/other judicially recognized exceptions, and raise the matter during assessment or appeal. Courts may accept the deduction where business necessity and genuineness are established.
Issue an account payee cheque/bank transfer to the party in place of the earlier cash payment within the permissible period. Submit revised documentation to the Assessing Officer at the time of assessment.
Appeal by Demonstrating Genuine Circumstance:
If payment mode cannot be changed, provide all supporting evidence to claim eligibility under Rule 6DD/other judicially recognized exceptions, and raise the matter during assessment or appeal. Courts may accept the deduction where business necessity and genuineness are established.
03 October 2025
Thanks a lot sir for your valuable reply....................really appreciate
03 October 2025
You are welcome.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Applicability of TDS on CFS, CHA fees, and shipping line charges
- Notice from IT DEPTT IF FD AMOUNT EXCEEDS 10 LACS
- Limited Liability Partnership Firm
- Unable to generate and save json file for updated return
- GST payable under RCM
- Applicablity on tds
- Section 194I not showing in TDS RPU for Compnay Assessee for TDS on rent
- LTCG offset against property buy
- PRODUCT AND SERVICE CATEGORY CODE
- Tax audit & Switching from Presumptive taxation
- Regarding TDS not deducted on rent
- REGARDING CLAIM OF LAST YEAR TDS
- Regarding income tax return of company and LLP
- Import purchase entry
- Under which tax head RCM on Commission on Sale is to be paid.
- Rule 54(1A) for Distributing ITC
- EXCESS CREDIT REALTED GST REVERSAL
- Export invoice not reported
- CA Articleship Extension Matter
- GST OFFICER WRONG NOTICE
Trending Online Classes
-
LIVE Course on GSTR-9 & GSTR-9C (Technical | Practical | Concept - Based)
Sachin Jain03 November 2025
CAclubindia
