Purchases added u/s 69 by ito
Querist : Anonymous
.
Have you shown, when the payment was made?
.
This may have happened due to the fact that you have failed in showing the details of the payment to the vendor against the so called purchases.
.
If confirmation letter is having details as regards receipt of a payment even after 2 years, then also the AO could not reject the purchases.
.
Querist : Anonymous
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- Need Professional Opinion - AY 2012-13 Old Demand & AY 2026-27 Refund Adjustment
- ITR 4 and Bank transactions
- IS AUDIT MANDATORY IF COMMISSION INCOME IS MORE THAN 50 LAKH
- EMI ISSUE IN HOUSING LOAN OLD REGIME
- Bank details not Visible on Traces Portal
- Taxability of Partnership firm for FY 2025-26
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
