Penalty u/s 629 a

This query is : Resolved 

17 July 2013 Dear Experts,

One company defaults the provision of Section 297 last 3 years back.
There is total 10 Director out of which 5 director whole time.
Now company go for approval of CG u/s 297 and compounding u/s 621A.
There is five associate concerns from which company are doing transaction covered u/s 297 last 3 years.
Now my question is that how much maximum penalty can be levied by RD/CLB ?
Please reply

21 July 2013 Hi

If a contract, which requires consent in advance or subsequently, is entered into without taking the consent, the contract is voidable at the option of the Board.

The section does not provide any penalty for non-compliance. The penalty would therefore, be as per the provisions of section 629A. (Section 629A indicates penalty for such sections of the Companies Act, 1956 for which no penalty has been specifically provided).

Accordingly, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be punishable with fine which may extend up to Rs. 500 for every day after the first day during which the contravention continues.

In the case of First Leasing Company of India Ltd. v Additional Registrar of Companies (1997) 89 Comp Cas 635 (Mad) it was held that the period of limitation began from the date on which the directors submitted their explanation and not from the date of the inspection report. The Court agreed that prima facie limitation begins on the date on which a document is filed with the Registrar of Companies.

21 July 2013
Section 297(1) does not apply to the employment as managing director/whole-time director: The Department has clarified vide Circular No. 13 of 1975, dated 5-6-1975 that 'supply of service' is not the same as 'rendering of service' as managing/whole-time director and that there are specific provisions regarding the matter. Hence the proviso to section 297(1) does not apply to the above appointments.

22 July 2013 Thanks for your valuable feedback.

Whether case of compounding will be referred to CLB or RD ?
As mentioned above what is role of period of limitation in our case ?
Whether application for filing of approval & compounding will be made separate ?

22 July 2013 Thanks for your valuable feedback.

Whether case of compounding will be referred to CLB or RD ?
As mentioned above what is role of period of limitation in our case ?
Whether application for filing of approval & compounding will be made separate ?

22 July 2013 Hi

Approval under section 297 of CG and compounding of offence will be made to ROC in Form-61.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro

Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 June 2026
Internal & Taxation Article

O P Bagla & Co LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 May 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates-Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
Sr. Financial Analyst - Consolidation

Search Synergy

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
Audit assistant

Displayandbeyond

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
23 May 2026
Article Assistant

Geeta Manchanda & CO.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Education Content Creator

Adyayam Education LLP

Bengaluru

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
CA / MBA (Finance) / CMA / M.Com (Finance)

Sri Aurobindo Gnostic Centre of Education

New Delhi

CA

View Details