Penalty proceedings after high court decision

This query is : Resolved

RAJIV (Querist)
Follow

25 January 2013 Post an assessment we had received an order of demand under sec 156.
Case was pending in high court and finally decided in our favour.

Now confirm that after decision of high court in our favour whats the validity of demand notice.

Pls substantitate your reply with section..

gbalakrishnan

gbalakrishnan (Expert)
Follow

26 January 2013 your note sec 156 Notice demand in what Notice pursuance particulars are not there, so it is not clear so kindly provide details to answer correctly please!

gbalakrishnan

gbalakrishnan (Expert)
Follow

26 January 2013 for eg if 156 notice is in pursuance to Notice u/s 144 r/w 143(2) and 142(1) after expiry of 12 months limit of time prescribed for retuen filed 12 months before the u/s 144 Notice r/w 143(2) and 142(1), naturally 156 Notice is invalid and void as Notice u/s 144 notice issued beyond limitation then notice u/s 156 automatically dies a natural death, even if the CIT persists and in such case move tribunal or HC which will cancel the first impinged notice in terms of Khurbhan hussain metcofferwala case by SC judgement which upheld Mysore high court judgement which is also followed in Arsina Hotels v DCIT.
Several times revenue moves headlong so as to terrorize assesees and some how get revenue that practice is very unfair, so evenBombay high court in a matter ACIT asking CIT to transfer the case to pune from mumbai, in this case High court pulled up the CIT and ACIT, which every one knows is it not

RAJIV

RAJIV (Querist)
Follow

28 January 2013 Case in high court was for inventory valuation. This we had lost in ITAT due to which department raised notice of demand u/s 156.

Post that we won in high court against the department.

Now pls advise the validity of notice under section 156.

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now