Outstanding demand for previous years
This query is : Open
30 November 2015
Dear Experts,
There are numerous cases coming for demand outstanding for Salaried Employees in the assesses account due to wrong pan mentioned by employer while filling their TDS return.
Now the problem is that the Employer are not ready to revise Tds return or making excuse for the same.
On the other hand department is not convinced on Form 16 only. They sent this for verification with employer, even after verification they are making escuse agin .
What remedies are available to assessee or professionals in these cases.
What should be the approach to resolve these issues.
There are numerous cases coming for demand outstanding for Salaried Employees in the assesses account due to wrong pan mentioned by employer while filling their TDS return.
Now the problem is that the Employer are not ready to revise Tds return or making excuse for the same.
On the other hand department is not convinced on Form 16 only. They sent this for verification with employer, even after verification they are making escuse agin .
What remedies are available to assessee or professionals in these cases.
What should be the approach to resolve these issues.
02 December 2015
dear experts,
what is a set of proceedure to be adopted in such issues..please help
what is a set of proceedure to be adopted in such issues..please help
08 December 2015
One way is to write to ITO(TDS) of appropriate jurisdiction explaining him the whole matter and request him to take appropriate action against the employer. Also provide a copy of this letter to the jurisdictional ITO who is not accepting form 16.
Message likes :
1 times
08 December 2015
But the Jurisdictional AO does not pay any attention even after notifying the ITO (TDS) Is there any case law that or CBDT Circular that clearly says that assessee may not be harassed if he has form 16.
09 December 2015
Yes there is a judgment of Delhi High court in Court on its own motion vs UOI in which the Delhi High court has directed that refund can be claimed if the assessee has form 16 and that he must not be harrassed if TDS return is not correctly filled by deductor. CBDT has also issued circulars in compliance of this HC order. You may mention this judgment and CBDT circular in your application to AO.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Amount transferred in HUF Account
- WRONG GSTR7 ENTRIES ACCEPTED ERRONEOUSLY
- GST input credit on commercial property
- Nursery business
- GST REFUND ISSUE ON PURCHASE OF PLANT AND MACHINERY
- Working on Gold wastage during Melting of old gold jewellery
- TDS on Dashcam rent and allied services
- Royalty payments to the Mining Department for procurement of murum - GST input
- Section 269ST applicability for capital introduced by partner to his partnership firm
- Capital gains in IT returns
- IMS (import of goods) ITC related
- Subject: Legal Remedy for Removal of Income Tax Demand for AY 2024–25 – Charitable Trust
- Expert Help Required for TDS Refund 100000 Through TRACES – AY 2022–23
- IMPORT PURCHASE ENTRY PASSED IN BOOKS OF ACCOUNT
- FAST DS 26 Undisclosed Foreign Asset Disclosure Scheme 2026
- Regime change
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- FAST-DS 2026 Under Tax Law - No recourse or support for person declaring via this scheme?
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
