Managerial remuneration- sch xiii
This query is : Resolved
28 August 2013
What is the managerial remuneration limit for a public listed company having no profits?
28 August 2013
Hi
Where public companies or private companies which are subsidiaries of public companies made payment of remuneration to managerial personnel in excess of the limits prescribed in sections 269, 310, 311 and 387 and in terms of section 198(4) read with Schedule XIII to the Companies Act, 1956, which provides scales of remuneration (salary, dearness allowance, perquisites and any other allowance).
Read Section II of Part II of Schedule XIII.
Where public companies or private companies which are subsidiaries of public companies made payment of remuneration to managerial personnel in excess of the limits prescribed in sections 269, 310, 311 and 387 and in terms of section 198(4) read with Schedule XIII to the Companies Act, 1956, which provides scales of remuneration (salary, dearness allowance, perquisites and any other allowance).
Read Section II of Part II of Schedule XIII.
Message likes :
1 times
28 August 2013
I did read the same. However, I wanted to know what all is included in 'remuneration' and if exceeded how to obtain central government approval?
28 August 2013
Hi
The remuneration includes pay, compensation, or reward for work, etc. The word remuneration is defined in the explanation appended to section 198 of the Companies Act. Accordingly, for the purposes of sections 198, 309, 310 and 311, remuneration shall include the following:—
(a) any expenditure incurred by the company in providing any rent free accommodation, or any other benefit or amenity in respect of accommodation, free of charge, to any of the company's directors and manager;
(b) any expenditure incurred by the company in providing any other benefit or amenity free of charge or at a concessional rate to any of the company's directors and manager;
(c) any expenditure incurred by the company in respect of any obligation or service, which, but for such expenditure by the company, would have been incurred by any of the company's directors and manager; and
(d) any expenditure incurred by the company to effect any insurance on the life of, or to provide any pension, annuity or gratuity for, any of the company's directors and manager or his spouse or child.
Expenditure incurred on maintenance of vehicles would fall within the meaning of the expression 'remuneration' and once remuneration is fixed as provided under section 309 it is not possible to state that the expenditure incurred by the company on personal use of car by directors would not be allowable deduction. In so far as the company is concerned the expenditure is business expenditure, which could not be disallowed as such. [Sayaji Iron & Engineering Co. v CIT (2002) Comp Cas 675 (Guj)].
The remuneration includes pay, compensation, or reward for work, etc. The word remuneration is defined in the explanation appended to section 198 of the Companies Act. Accordingly, for the purposes of sections 198, 309, 310 and 311, remuneration shall include the following:—
(a) any expenditure incurred by the company in providing any rent free accommodation, or any other benefit or amenity in respect of accommodation, free of charge, to any of the company's directors and manager;
(b) any expenditure incurred by the company in providing any other benefit or amenity free of charge or at a concessional rate to any of the company's directors and manager;
(c) any expenditure incurred by the company in respect of any obligation or service, which, but for such expenditure by the company, would have been incurred by any of the company's directors and manager; and
(d) any expenditure incurred by the company to effect any insurance on the life of, or to provide any pension, annuity or gratuity for, any of the company's directors and manager or his spouse or child.
Expenditure incurred on maintenance of vehicles would fall within the meaning of the expression 'remuneration' and once remuneration is fixed as provided under section 309 it is not possible to state that the expenditure incurred by the company on personal use of car by directors would not be allowable deduction. In so far as the company is concerned the expenditure is business expenditure, which could not be disallowed as such. [Sayaji Iron & Engineering Co. v CIT (2002) Comp Cas 675 (Guj)].
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- CAPITAL GAIN BASE ON NOTIFICATION
- Form 140 tds
- Taxable or Tax exempt
- ADVANCE PAYMENT OF ADVOCATE
- NRI starting business in India
- ITDS U/S.194T of Firm
- CREDIT NOTES WITHOUT GST
- GST not cancelled by tenant
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- FORM 141 SDV query
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
