A user sold shares held for over a year, expecting Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) tax treatment. However, their broker classified the subsequent repurchase of the same shares as a speculative gain, even though delivery-based orders were placed for both transactions. The user is seeking clarification on how this discrepancy arises, questioning the broker's deviation from FIFO principles and whether they should complain to SEBI.
15 June 2025
Even though you placed the order assuming it to be delivery based, but the actual delivery of the stocks might not have occurred, as such it was the square up of the deal. Unless the shares are not deducted from your demat account it cannot be called as delivery based transaction.
15 June 2025
In contract note, it is taken as intraday. But my orders are clearly on Delivery based and there is documentary proof for this. This means that trades have been executed contrary to my orders. Moreover Income tax rules do not specify that FIFO is applicable only when the orders are on different dates.
16 June 2025
You should have got it rectified from your agent based on your order proof. Income tax takes the feed from the agency/contract note, not otherwise.