Leave encashment or carry forward of leave
This query is : Resolved
22 February 2008
Hi,
I would like to know is carry forward of leave or leave encashment at the end of every year is desiarable.In case leave is carryforward then is the provision for leave encashment allowed under the income tax act in the year of provision.
I would like to know is carry forward of leave or leave encashment at the end of every year is desiarable.In case leave is carryforward then is the provision for leave encashment allowed under the income tax act in the year of provision.
23 February 2008
As per the Amendment to section 43B(F) of the Income-Tax Act 1961, companies could claim deduction only for actual cash flow and not for the provisions made. The amendment was brought in by the government to nullify a Supreme Court verdict given in the case of Bharat Earth Movers.
But, according to a recent ruling by the Calcutta High Court, companies will be able to claim deduction based on provision for leave encashment. The decision came in response to a petition filed by Exide Industries. The court has termed the amendment carried out by government as arbitrary and struck it out.
What the high court has held is for other items covered under Section 43B like statutory duties, payments to excise department, contribution to provident funds and interest payments to banks. Giving deduc- tion only on account of actual cash outflow was appropriate as public money was involved in the payments and the government wanted to stop misuse of public money. However, leave encashment is not a statutory liability and does not involve public money. The decision will help companies as they would be able to claim deduction for the payouts and would reflect on their balance-sheet.
The high court pointed the original Section 43B did have the sub-section F covering leave encashments. Section 43B was brought in only to prevent evasion of statutory liability and sub-section F was inserted in 2001 only to nullify the apex court’s decision.
It is upto a to take a view in the light of the above.
But, according to a recent ruling by the Calcutta High Court, companies will be able to claim deduction based on provision for leave encashment. The decision came in response to a petition filed by Exide Industries. The court has termed the amendment carried out by government as arbitrary and struck it out.
What the high court has held is for other items covered under Section 43B like statutory duties, payments to excise department, contribution to provident funds and interest payments to banks. Giving deduc- tion only on account of actual cash outflow was appropriate as public money was involved in the payments and the government wanted to stop misuse of public money. However, leave encashment is not a statutory liability and does not involve public money. The decision will help companies as they would be able to claim deduction for the payouts and would reflect on their balance-sheet.
The high court pointed the original Section 43B did have the sub-section F covering leave encashments. Section 43B was brought in only to prevent evasion of statutory liability and sub-section F was inserted in 2001 only to nullify the apex court’s decision.
It is upto a to take a view in the light of the above.
23 February 2008
AS PER SECTION 43B DEDUCTION SHALL BE ALLOWABLE ONLY IN THE YEAR OF PAYMENT AND NOT ON PROVISION BASIS
23 February 2008
I would like to know should company encourage carryforward of leave or encashment of leave? which is the better option.
23 February 2008
That decision you have to take based on the answers you have got for your query
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Refund Annexure-B
- Liable to deduct tds and 44ADA
- Sale of Equity shares for Purchase of Residential Property
- Nomination of Bank for refund in itr 2
- Section 56(2) of the Income tax Act 1961 , Gift to relative .
- ECO SUPPLY REPORTIONG IN GSTR-1
- Is Interest applicable for payment made through credit ledger vide DRC03 for FY 2020-21 & 2021-22
- CCFS 2026 Schemed
- Subscription paid to foreign customer
- Two seprate Invoice needed
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
